

TEMPLAR BATTLES
Greatest battles of the Knights Templar & Warfare
The Knights Templar were reputed to be the bravest soldiers during the Crusades – first into battle and last to quit the action. Fighting in strict formation and toughened by a spartan regime of military drills and prayer. So, what were the greatest battles that involved the Knights Templar?
The Siege of Ascalon – The Siege of Ascalon was a military conflict that took place from January 25 to August 22, 1153. The Kingdom of Jerusalem defeated the Fatimid Caliphate and captured the city of Ascalon. The siege was part of the Crusader–Fatimid wars. Baldwin III of Jerusalem led a large army against Ascalon. The siege lasted months. The Christians used siege engines and catapults. The Egyptians were unable to challenge the Franks on land. The Christians were unable to gain superiority over the Egyptians at sea.
The garrison surrendered on August 10, allowing the garrison to leave peacefully. The Christians occupied the city and gained a large amount of treasure. Ascalon was an important castle that was used by the Fatimids to launch raids into the Crusader kingdom’s territory. It was the last coastal city in Palestine that was not controlled by the Crusaders.
The Battle of Montgisard in 1177 – The Knights Templar, led by Baldwin IV of Jerusalem, defeated Saladin’s army despite being outnumbered. The Templars’ military skills and combat spirit were on display in this victory. About 500 Templar knights and several thousand infantry defeated Saladin’s army of over 26,000 soldiers.
The Christian forces, led by 16-year-old King Baldwin IV of Jerusalem, were outnumbered by the Muslim army. The Christian forces lured the Muslim army into marshy ground, where they were defeated. The Christian forces captured Saladin’s baggage train. Saladin fled back to Cairo with only a tenth of his army.
It was a famous victory for the Knights Templar. The battle was an important episode in Knight of Jerusalem, the first book in a three part biography of Balian d’Ibelin.
The Battle of Hattin – A decisive battle that was a catastrophe for the Crusaders. The Knights Templar and other leading men of the kingdom of Jerusalem were trapped in a wasteland without water and surrounded by hostile forces. This battle led to the loss of Jerusalem.
On July 4, 1187, the Muslim army of Saladin defeated the Christian Crusader army at the Horns of Hattin in northern Palestine. This was a turning point in the Crusades and led to the Muslim reconquest of Jerusalem.
The Crusaders were camped at Sepphoris when they heard that Saladin attacked Tiberias. Around 20,000 Crusaders left their camp to relieve Tiberias. The Crusaders ran out of water while being harassed by Saladin’s cavalry. Saladin’s army surrounded the Crusaders and cut off their retreat. The Muslim army captured or killed most of the Crusader forces.
The Battle of Hattin is considered the most famous battle of the Crusades. It galvanised Muslim forces and made Saladin a revered hero. The battle prompted the Third Crusade, which began in 1189.
The Siege of Tomar – The Siege of Tomar was a military battle in 1190 in which the Knights Templar successfully defended the city of Tomar, Portugal from an Islamic army. The battle was a key event in the Portuguese Reconquista. The Almohad caliph Abu Yusuf Ya’qub al Mansur led an Islamic army across the Tagus River and surrounded Tomar Castle.
The siege lasted six days, with the Muslims attempting to conquer the castle several times. The Templars, led by Grand Master Gualdim Pais, defeated the Muslims. The battle was so violent that the Almedina Door became known as the Blood Door. The victory confirmed the military strength of the Knights Templar and their role in defending Portugal from the Moors. The Knights Templar castle and the Convent of Christ within the castle are a UNESCO World Heritage Site
The Battle of Legnica – The Battle of Legnica was a Mongol victory over a Christian alliance on April 9, 1241. The battle took place near the city of Legnica in Poland during the first Mongol invasion of Europe. The Mongols used a smokescreen to hide their movements and confuse the Europeans.
The Mongols tricked the Christian army into pursuing them by feigning retreat. The Mongols sent in their heavy cavalry, while their archers kept up a deadly barrage of arrows. The Mongols beheaded Duke Henry II of Silesia and paraded his head on a spear before the town of Legnica. The Battle of Legnica was the furthest point the Mongols reached in Europe. It marked the complete defeat of the Christian forces.
The Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa – The Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa was a Christian victory over the Almohad Muslims on July 16, 1212. It was a key turning point in the Christian reconquest of Spain. The Christian forces of King Alfonso VIII of Castile, Sancho VII of Navarre, and Peter II of Aragon defeated the Almohad army led by the caliph al-Nasir.
The Christian forces caught the Almohad army off guard, breaking through their defensive line of slave-warriors. The battle was a major success for the papacy of Innocent III. It was the first crusade to successfully implement all aspects of papal crusade policy.
The Siege of Acre 1189-1191 – The siege lasted almost two years, making it one of the longest sieges of the Middle Ages. The Crusaders built ramparts and dug ditches to protect themselves. The Crusaders were able to break through Acre’s walls in July 1191. The siege was a key victory for the Crusaders and a setback for Saladin’s plans.
The siege involved armies from Europe, Syria, Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Maghreb. The Crusaders were led by King Richard I of England, King Philip II Augustus of France, and Duke Leopold V of Austria. The Crusaders defeated Saladin’s relief force and forced the garrison to surrender. The siege was a major setback for Saladin’s plans to destroy the Crusader states. The siege was one of the last major sieges before the use of gunpowder.
The siege inspired a new wave of Crusading fervour. The siege widened the rift between the Crusader leadership. King Philip and Leopold returned to Europe, taking their contingents with them. Richard took the Crusader Army further into the Holy Land to continue his campaign against Saladin.
The Siege of Acre 1291 – The Siege of Acre in 1291 was when the Mamluks defeated the Crusaders and took control of the city of Acre. This marked the end of the Crusades in the Levant and the fall of the last major Crusader stronghold in the Holy Land.
The siege resulted in the loss of Acre to the Mamluks, ending the Crusaders’ control of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. The fall of Acre was the final fatal blow to Christian Crusader ambitions in the Holy Land. The Christians – including the Knights Templar – were forced to flee for good and seek refuge on Cyprus.
If you’d like to know more about the greatest battles fought by the Knights Templar in the Crusades – then get hold of this book: The Knights Templar – History & Mystery – by Tony McMahon – published by Pen & Sword – available on Amazon, Waterstones, Barnes & Noble, WHSmith, and other online bookstores.


Strategies of War: A Comprehensive Guide to Medieval Battle Tactics
The medieval period, spanning from the 5th to the late 15th century, was marked by constant warfare. As empires rose and fell, military strategy and tactics evolved, shaping the outcomes of countless battles. This article delves deep into the nuances of medieval battle tactics, offering insight into how wars were waged in the Middle Ages.
What Type of Warfare Did Medieval Armies Engage in?
Medieval armies engaged in a multifaceted and evolving form of warfare that reflected the technological, social, and cultural changes of the time. From open-field battles to prolonged sieges, the type of warfare was highly diverse.
In open-field battles, both infantry and cavalry played significant roles. Infantry formations like the shield wall or pike square were vital in defending against cavalry charges. Meanwhile, cavalry units, including heavily armored knights, often acted as the primary offensive force, employing tactics such as the charge and feigned retreat.
Siege warfare was another prominent aspect of the medieval battlefield. Castles and fortified cities were common, and armies had to develop specific strategies and tools, such as battering rams, siege towers, and trebuchets, to breach these fortifications. The process could be painstakingly slow, sometimes involving months of blockade and starvation tactics.
Naval warfare also played a role in the medieval period, particularly in regions like the Mediterranean. Fleets of galleys or longships would engage in both trade and warfare, with Viking raids being one of the most famous examples.
Additionally, psychological warfare, including the use of propaganda, espionage, and intimidation tactics, was often employed to weaken or manipulate opponents.
Religious influence permeated medieval warfare as well. The Crusades were a series of religiously motivated military campaigns where Western Christian forces sought to capture or retain sacred sites.
In summary, medieval warfare was not confined to a single type; instead, it encompassed a wide range of strategies and tactics, adapting to the varied landscapes, technologies, and cultural influences of the era. Whether on land or sea, in open fields, or behind towering walls, medieval armies engaged in a complex and nuanced form of warfare that continues to intrigue historians and enthusiasts alike.
The Importance of Terrain
Medieval commanders recognized the strategic importance of terrain in determining the outcome of a battle. Elevated positions such as hills or ridges were coveted, as they offered defenders a clear line of sight and the advantage of gravity against attackers. Depending on how they were used, marshes, rivers, and forests could be both obstacles and assets. By understanding and leveraging the terrain, armies could corner their enemies or escape from unfavorable encounters.
Formation and Infantry
Shield Wall
One of the earliest medieval formations was the shield wall, where soldiers stood side by side, holding their shields up to form a protective barrier. This dense line made it hard for enemy soldiers to penetrate and was especially effective against cavalry charges.
Pike Square
Later in the Middle Ages, the pike square became a favored formation. Soldiers armed with long pikes would form a tight square, their weapons protruding outward. This was an excellent deterrent against cavalry, with the long pikes keeping horses at bay.
Did Medieval Armies Fight in Lines?
Yes, medieval armies frequently fought in lines, and line formations played a central role in medieval battle tactics. The use of lines in warfare served various practical purposes.
One common line formation was the shield wall, where soldiers stood shoulder to shoulder, holding their shields to create a protective barrier. This formation was particularly effective in repelling enemy charges and protecting against missile fire.
Archers and crossbowmen also employed line formations, allowing them to fire volleys of arrows in a coordinated manner. This could create a devastating rain of projectiles, thinning enemy ranks or disrupting their formations.
Cavalry, too, would often form lines for charges. By maintaining a straight line and charging at full speed, they could present a united front that was more likely to break through the enemy’s defenses.
Line formations allowed for better control and coordination among troops. They helped maintain order in the chaos of battle, made it easier for commanders to issue orders, and facilitated defensive and offensive maneuvers.
Yet, these line formations also had their vulnerabilities. They could be susceptible to flanking or outmaneuvered by more mobile forces. An ill-timed or poorly executed line formation could lead to disaster.
Overall, fighting in lines was a fundamental aspect of medieval warfare, reflecting the importance of discipline, coordination, and strategy in achieving success on the battlefield.
Cavalry Tactics
Cavalry units were the medieval equivalent of armored tanks. Swift and powerful, they had the ability to change the tide of battle.
The Charge
The most basic cavalry tactic was the straightforward charge. Knights or mounted soldiers would gather momentum and charge at the enemy lines, intending to break through or create chaos.
Feigned Retreat
This tactic involved pretending to flee from the battlefield, only to regroup and attack once the enemy was out of formation. A feigned retreat could lure unsuspecting enemies into a trap when executed well.
Siege Warfare
Given the prevalence of castles and fortresses, many medieval battles took the form of sieges. These were prolonged affairs, where one army attempted to break into a fortified place.
Battering Rams and Siege Towers
Used to breach or scale walls, these siege engines were vital to any successful siege. Battering rams targeted weak points in walls, while siege towers allowed soldiers to climb over fortifications.
Starvation
Sometimes, the best strategy was patience. Armies would blockade a castle, cut off its supplies, and wait for the defenders to surrender out of hunger or desperation.
Missile Troops and Artillery
Archers and Crossbowmen
These ranged troops were integral to the medieval battlefield. English longbowmen, for instance, were famous for their prowess, capable of releasing volleys of arrows that could decimate opposing forces.
Trebuchets and Ballistas
As medieval technology advanced, so did the tools of war. Trebuchets were powerful siege engines capable of hurling massive rocks or fireballs. Ballistas, on the other hand, were like giant crossbows, launching large projectiles at enemy forces or walls.
Psychological Warfare
Mental tactics played as much a role in medieval warfare as physical combat. The terrifying war cries, the thundering hooves of cavalry, or even the mere reputation of a fierce army could break the enemy’s spirit before swords ever clashed.
Propaganda and Espionage
Spreading rumors about an impending attack or sowing distrust within enemy ranks was an age-old strategy. Spies were employed to gather intelligence or sabotage the opponent from within.
The Use of Fire and Chemical Weapons
The use of fire and chemical weapons in medieval warfare represents a fascinating aspect of military innovation and tactical development during this period. While not as advanced as contemporary chemical weaponry, these tools were employed to considerable effect.
Greek Fire: One of the most famous examples of a chemical weapon in the Middle Ages was Greek Fire. Used primarily by the Byzantine Empire, it was an explosive compound whose exact composition remains a mystery. It could continue burning even on water, making it particularly devastating in naval warfare. Greek Fire was deployed through flamethrowers or hurled in pots, which struck terror in those who faced it.
Flaming Arrows and Projectiles: Flaming arrows and incendiary devices were used to set buildings, siege equipment, and even ships ablaze. They were also employed against personnel, causing chaos and panic in enemy ranks.
Poisoned Weapons: Though not widespread, there are accounts of poison being applied to arrows or other projectiles. The intent was to ensure that even a non-fatal wound might become lethal through infection or poisoning.
Smoke and Noxious Fumes: Certain battles saw the use of smoke or other noxious fumes to disorient or disable the enemy. This could be achieved by burning specific materials or chemicals that create a smokescreen or toxic cloud.
While rudimentary compared to modern standards, these tactics were effective for their time. The use of fire and chemical weapons added a psychological element to warfare, instilling fear and uncertainty in opponents. Moreover, it reflected a level of technological and tactical ingenuity that continues to intrigue historians and military enthusiasts. The willingness to innovate and experiment with such weapons underscores the complexity and evolving nature of medieval warfare.
The Role of Religion
In the medieval world, religion was interwoven with every aspect of life, including warfare. Battles were often seen as holy endeavors, and various tactics were employed with a religious twist.
Crusader Tactics
During the Crusades, Western European knights faced Middle Eastern armies with different tactics and weapons. Adaptations such as the cavalry charge combined with infantry support proved effective against more mobile Muslim forces.
The Oriflamme
This was a sacred banner used by the French, signifying that no prisoners would be taken. When raised, it signaled the intent for total victory or utter defeat, pushing soldiers to fight with heightened fervor.
Naval Warfare in the Medieval Era
Naval warfare in the medieval era was a vital and dynamic aspect of military strategy, reflecting the growing importance of maritime trade routes, exploration, and the control of coastal territories. Here’s an overview of key features and developments in medieval naval warfare:
-
Ship Design: The period saw significant advancements in ship design, such as the development of the cog in Northern Europe. These larger, more stable vessels allowed for the transportation of more substantial loads, including soldiers and horses.
-
Viking Longships: One of the most iconic images of medieval naval warfare comes from the Vikings. Their longships were fast, sleek, and shallow-drafted, allowing them to navigate both open seas and rivers. This enabled them to raid deep inland, changing the dynamics of naval engagement.
-
Greek Fire in the Byzantine Navy: The Byzantine Empire’s navy was famous for its use of Greek Fire. Deployed through tubes or siphons, this incendiary weapon was particularly effective in naval battles, which could set enemy ships ablaze.
-
Galley Warfare in the Mediterranean: The galley, propelled by oars and sail, was the principal warship in the Mediterranean. It was designed for ramming and boarding enemy ships, and its usage led to unique tactical considerations.
-
Naval Sieges and Blockades: Controlling the sea was essential to siege coastal cities successfully. Naval blockades were employed to cut off supplies, leading to the starvation and eventual surrender of besieged cities.
-
Piracy and Privateering: Piracy was a constant concern during the medieval era, and many states employed privateers to protect or raid trade routes.
-
The Role of Naval Battles in the Crusades: Control over the Mediterranean was vital for the transportation of troops and supplies during the Crusades, leading to several significant naval battles.
-
Technological Innovations: The introduction of cannons and other advancements in maritime technology gradually began to change the nature of naval warfare towards the end of the medieval period.
In conclusion, naval warfare in the medieval era was a complex and evolving field encompassing a wide range of strategies, technologies, and tactics. Whether in the North Sea, the Atlantic, or the Mediterranean, the control of waterways was vital for trade, defense, and power projection. The legacy of these innovations and experiences continues to influence naval warfare and maritime strategy to this day.
What Were the Most Effective Medieval Tactics?
The most effective medieval tactics were those that combined strategic thinking, technological innovation, and a deep understanding of human psychology and terrain. Here’s a look at some tactics that stood out:
-
Shield Wall Formation: Early medieval infantry often used the shield wall, a tightly packed formation of shields, providing excellent defense against enemy attacks and cavalry charges.
-
Cavalry Charges: Utilized by knights and mounted warriors, the cavalry charge was a powerful offensive tactic capable of breaking through enemy lines and creating panic within the ranks.
-
Siege Techniques: In an era dominated by castles and fortified cities, siege engines like battering rams, trebuchets, and siege towers became crucial. Starvation tactics, where a fortress was blockaded until its occupants surrendered, were equally effective.
-
Feigned Retreat: This clever ruse involved pretending to flee, drawing the enemy out of formation, and then turning to attack them in a vulnerable position.
-
Longbowmen: English longbowmen were renowned for their skill, capable of firing arrows with remarkable speed and accuracy. Their use at battles like Agincourt proved decisive.
-
Flanking and Encircling: Maneuvering forces to attack the enemy from the sides or rear could disrupt their formation and morale, leading to a swift victory.
-
Use of Terrain: Understanding and utilizing the landscape was essential. For instance, positioning forces on a hill provided a defensive advantage and made attacking more challenging for the enemy.
-
Religious Symbolism: In a deeply religious era, invoking religious symbols and beliefs could galvanize troops, as seen in the Crusades.
-
Combined Arms: Integrating different types of troops, such as infantry, cavalry, and archers, allowed for more flexible and effective battlefield control.
These tactics were not static but evolved over time, adapting to new technologies, discoveries, and shifting cultural norms. The effectiveness of a particular tactic often depended on the context in which it was employed, the commanders’ skill and leadership, and the troops’ quality and morale. These various tactics paint a picture of a sophisticated and multifaceted approach to warfare, with lessons that continue to resonate in modern military thinking.
Warfare’s Impact on Medieval Society and Economy
Warfare during the medieval period had profound and far-reaching impacts on society and the economy, shaping the very fabric of life during these tumultuous centuries.
-
Social Structure and Nobility: The feudal system, which was prevalent in medieval Europe, was intrinsically linked to warfare. Nobles and knights held lands in exchange for military service to their overlords. This relationship between land, military service, and social status defined the hierarchy and social dynamics of the time.
-
Economic Strain and Development: Maintaining an army was an expensive endeavor, requiring constant funding for weapons, armor, food, and pay. This burden often fell on the peasantry through taxes and levies, causing economic strain. On the other hand, warfare also spurred technological innovation and trade in arms and armor, contributing to economic development in some regions.
-
Impact on Peasants: The peasantry, who formed the bulk of the population, were heavily impacted by warfare. Fields were destroyed, villages were plundered, and civilians were often caught in the crossfire. This destruction could lead to famine and widespread suffering.
-
Rise of Professional Armies: As wars became more complex and frequent, the need for professional standing armies emerged. This shift had implications for society, leading to the rise of a class of professional soldiers and decreasing the military influence of the nobility.
-
Urbanization and Fortifications: The need to defend against attacks led to building castles and fortified cities. These fortifications became centers of economic and political activity, leading to urbanization.
-
Cultural and Ideological Impact: Warfare, especially during the Crusades, fostered cultural exchange and entrenched religious and cultural divides. The idea of chivalry and the knightly code emerged, influencing literature, art, and social norms.
-
Mercantilism and Trade: The constant state of warfare led to increased demand for supplies, boosting trade routes and commerce, particularly in weaponry, horses, and food.
Ultimately, warfare was not merely a series of isolated events but a pervasive aspect of medieval life that influenced everything from daily life to political structures, economic systems, and cultural expressions. Its multifaceted impacts created a complex interplay between military needs and societal development, setting the stage for many modern social, political, and economic structures we recognize today.
Summary
Medieval battle tactics resulted from centuries of evolution, influenced by technological innovations, cultural shifts, and the lessons of countless wars. Understanding these tactics offers a window into the medieval mindset and illuminates the intricacies of warfare during one of history’s most tumultuous periods. As with all historical study, appreciating the nuances of medieval warfare grants us a deeper understanding of the human experience and the lengths to which societies will go to secure their future.


The Siege of Jerusalem (1187): The Templars’ Stand Against Saladin
Crusades, Crusades Major Battles, History of the Knights Templar, Key Events in Knights Templar History, Third Crusade
Welcome to our in-depth exploration of the historic Siege of Jerusalem that took place in 1187. This article will delve into the captivating story of the Knights Templar’s brave defense against Saladin’s forces, highlighting their unwavering commitment and remarkable tactics. The Siege of Jerusalem in 1187 was a pivotal event during the Crusades, a series […]
The Siege of Jerusalem (1187): The Templars’ Stand Against Saladin Read More »
Explore the Intriguing History of the Northern Crusade
Crusader Leaders, Crusades, Crusades Battles & Sieges, Crusades Cultural Impact & Legacy, Crusades Key Figures, Crusades Legacy, Crusades Major Battles, Crusades Tactics & Weaponry
Dive into the dramatic and turbulent saga of the Northern Crusade, a pivotal chapter in medieval history that witnessed an intense clash between the Teutonic Order and pagan forces in the Baltic region. This conflict, characterized by fierce military campaigns, religious fervor, and profound cultural shifts, unfolded over many years and left a lasting impact
Explore the Intriguing History of the Northern Crusade Read More »
Explore the Fascinating History of Medieval Crusades
Crusader Leaders, Crusader States, Crusader States Formation & Governance, Crusades, Crusades Battles & Sieges, Crusades Cultural Impact & Legacy, Crusades Impact on the East, Crusades Impact on the West, Crusades Legacy, Crusades Major Battles, Crusades Tactics & Weaponry, Crusades Timeline, Reasons for the Crusades
Step back in time and discover the gripping tales of the medieval Crusades. This extraordinary period of history, also known as the Holy Wars, was a centuries-long struggle for control over the Holy Land that shaped the political, cultural, and religious landscape of the Middle Ages and beyond. The medieval crusades were a series of
Explore the Fascinating History of Medieval Crusades Read More »
Unveiling the Cathar Crusade: A Historical Deep Dive
Crusader Leaders, Crusades, Crusades Battles & Sieges, Crusades Cultural Impact & Legacy, Crusades Impact on the East, Crusades Key Figures, Crusades Legacy, Crusades Major Battles, Crusades Tactics & Weaponry, Knights Templar Ceremonies and Rituals, Knights Templar Initiation, Papal Influence in Crusades, Reasons for the Crusades
The Cathar Crusade, also known as the Albigensian Crusade, was a significant military campaign that took place in southern France during the medieval period. The campaign was initiated by Pope Innocent III in response to the rising popularity of Catharism, a religious movement that deviated from mainstream Catholicism and sparked conflict with the Church. In
Unveiling the Cathar Crusade: A Historical Deep Dive Read More »
Comprehensive Crusades Timeline of Holy Wars
Crusades, Crusades Major Battles, Crusades Timeline, First Crusade, Fourth Crusade, Later Crusades, Medieval Soldiers, Reasons for the Crusades, Second Crusade, Third Crusade
Welcome to our comprehensive timeline of the Crusades – a series of holy wars fought between Christians and Muslims over control of the Holy Land. The Crusades were a pivotal period in world history, with far-reaching consequences that continue to resonate in the present day. By understanding the timeline of events, we can gain a
Comprehensive Crusades Timeline of Holy Wars Read More »
Discover Who Was the Most Famous Crusader in History
Crusader Leaders, Crusades, Crusades Battles & Sieges, Crusades Key Figures, Crusades Major Battles, First Crusade, Fourth Crusade, Later Crusades, Medieval Times, Second Crusade, Third Crusade
The Crusades were a series of religious and military campaigns fought between Christians and Muslims in the Middle Ages. Spanning over two centuries, they had a profound impact on the history and culture of Europe and the Middle East. But who was the most famous Crusader of them all? In this article, we will explore
Discover Who Was the Most Famous Crusader in History Read More »
Unlocking History: 3rd Crusade Key Events Uncovered
Crusades, Crusades Battles & Sieges, Crusades Major Battles, Medieval Times, Third Crusade
Welcome to a journey through time as we explore the historical events of the 3rd Crusade. This pivotal chapter in medieval history witnessed the clash of Christian and Muslim forces, the rise of legendary figures, and the enduring impact on European politics and religion. The 3rd Crusade was a defining moment in the Middle Ages,
Unlocking History: 3rd Crusade Key Events Uncovered Read More »
Crucial Dates of the Crusades: A Detailed Timeline Overview
Crusades, Crusades Battles & Sieges, Crusades Major Battles, Crusades Timeline, Medieval Times
Welcome to our detailed timeline overview of the Crusades, a crucial period in medieval history. The Crusades were a series of holy wars fought between Christians and Muslims over control of the Holy Land, including Jerusalem. This period of history spans from the late 11th century to the late 13th century and had a significant
Crucial Dates of the Crusades: A Detailed Timeline Overview Read More »
Unintended Consequences: The Surprising Outcomes of the 4th Crusade
Crusades, Crusades Major Battles, Fourth Crusade, History of the Knights Templar, Medieval Times
When the Fourth Crusade was launched in 1202, its main objective was to recapture Jerusalem from Muslim forces. However, the crusade took an unexpected turn that resulted in a series of consequences that continue to impact the Mediterranean region today. The Fourth Crusade was characterized by political and religious tensions among the participants, which ultimately
Unintended Consequences: The Surprising Outcomes of the 4th Crusade Read More »


Templar battle fighting tactics
The Knights Templar are widely regarded as a very driven group of warrior monks who exercised tight discipline and struck fear into the enemy. But what were their battle fighting tactics? And were they effective?
One thing we do know is that they were a unique military proposition combining monk and soldier. They emerged just as a new order of monks, the Cistercians, were also launching. And the two organisations had a lot in common.
Templars linked to a new order of monks
The spiritual mentor of the Knights Templar, and their biggest advocate in western Christendom, was Saint Bernard of Clairvaux. Like many of the early Templars, Bernard was born into the Burgundian nobility but turned his back on earthly comforts from an early age. Becoming a monk, he joined a growing number who felt that the Benedictines, the most prolific monastic order of the time, were insufficiently ascetic.
Bernard wanted a return to the spirit of self-denial and rejection of worldly goods that had characterised the earliest Christian monks. Bernard’s own brutal self-punishing regime caused periods of ill-health. He was often seen kneeling in church with a sick bucket at his side. But he was undaunted. And in the Knights Templar, he saw the military expression of his severe approach to monasticism.
Bernard presided over a growing band of monks at the abbey of Cîteaux which broke away decisively from the Benedictines electing to wear white habits instead of the Benedictine black. Together with the first Templar Grand Master Hugh de Payens, Bernard developed the Latin Rule, which determined how Templars would conduct themselves.
Both the Cistercians and Templars grew in tandem with a very similar outlook. The only differences were practical, such as the level of fasting. Knights were allowed a more lenient regime on account of having to fight in battle. A hungry, dizzy knight was going to be no match for a well fed Saracen.
The Rule Book
At the very beginning, the Knights Templar chose to be governed by the long established Rule of Saint Augustine. They would be knights who took the monastic vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience. Then, under the guidance of Saint Bernard, the Templar rule book was established. This was as much about moral conduct as battle tactics – though the two were intertwined.
The Templar approach to battle wasn’t just about armour and weapons but also an ethos and demeanour. These knights were celibate and eschewed lustful thoughts. They were forbidden to be boastful or gossip. Laughter was discouraged.
Unlike secular knights, they were not to engage in hunting, gambling, whoring, or keeping bad company. In short, there were none of the psychological releases that a secular knight enjoyed. Instead, outside of battle, the day was punctuated with prayer.
Saint Bernard preached that by taking the cross, crusaders were wiping away sin and smoothing the path to their own heavenly glory. In war, they would commit the act of homicide – which one might assume contravened the Ten Commandments. Thou shalt not kill. And many observers certainly felt uneasy at the thought of killer monks. But Bernard reasoned that these Templars were committing ‘malecide’ – the killing of evil as opposed to human beings. This was slaughter in the name of God. And therefore OK.
Was all this theological stuff necessary to create a battle-ready knight? Well as any battle commander will tell you – great armies are forged not just by their hardware but by their esprit de corps. What goes on in a soldier’s mind is as important as what they do physically. If they believe their cause is just, then they will fight with greater vigour and effectiveness.
As Saint Bernard put it, the Templars would go into combat with the “breastplate of faith”.
FIND OUT MORE: What was in the Knight Templar rule book?
Templars charging in unison
There was a strong Templar collective spirit. Knights were to act in concert in battle and not seek individual glory. They were a cohesive, indivisible unit. The Templars looked out for each other and were prepared for the ultimate act of self-sacrifice to protect their comrades. And they were to look after those injured or sick.
One of their most distinguishing hallmarks was their cavalry charge in battle where the knights would gallop forward in close formation. We are told this struck terror into the Saracens. While many Templars had been knights beforehand and learned basic battle skills, this kind of tactic must have been picked up after joining the order. Secular knights didn’t charge in quite such a tight-knit manner.
Arms – keeping it simple
When it came to their weapons and other equipment, the Templars were all about simplicity. No fancy gold or silver ornamentation, twiddly designs, or elaborate coverings for shields and lances. This echoed Saint Bernard’s contempt for bibles that were ostentatiously illuminated or churches stuffed with gargoyles and no-expenses-spared sculptures. Again, a military expression of his strict monasticism.
The knights were allocated three or four horses and a squire to assist. There would be two destriers (warhorses); a palfroy (riding horse); and a roncin (packhorse). Some knights might have ridden a mule instead of a palfroy. I’ve blogged about the size of warhorses previously but just to reiterate that a Templar warhorse would have been quite short by today’s standards. So erase any thoughts of a gigantic stallion.
If a horse was killed in battle or equipment lost then the Templar knight had to explain himself to an official, called the ‘draper’, acting for the Master, who would then decide whether to replace these things.
Let’s detail what a Templar knight wore for battle:
-
Knights wore a padded jerkin close to their body offering additional protection
-
Over the jerkin, there was a long-sleeved chain mail cover known as a ‘hauberk’
-
Over the head a chain mail hood called a ‘coif’
-
A helmet over the coif which was open-faced in the 12th century and enclosed later on
-
Chain mail leggings or ‘chausses’
-
Over the chain mail a white surcoat
-
A kite-shaped shield with black and white design
-
Three knives: dagger, bread knife, small knife
-
A thirteen foot long wooden lance
-
A Turkish mace
Initially, they seem to have worn a monastic-style cloak that restricted arm movement in battle and this was replaced by an arm-less surcoat. It seems odd to us but the Pope got involved in discussions about battle dress even though the supreme pontiff didn’t go to battle himself.
The importance of uniform
For the enemy in battle, the appearance of the Knights Templar must have been chilling. Here was a group of knights with an easily recognisable uniform. Their white mantles symbolising purity and a rejection of sin with a hint of martyrdom. On the left breast of the white mantle was the distinctive red cross. Almost an early example of modern branding. Everybody in the medieval era was familiar with the Templar logo.
One has to imagine what it was like for those fighting the crusaders to see these well disciplined knights, their white mantles billowing in the wind, charging towards them. And knowing that they had no fear of death.

Medieval Sword Types Used by the Templar Knights: From Arming Swords to Great Swords
The Templar Knights were known for their bravery and skill in battle. Their use of many types of medieval swords was key to their success in the Middle Ages.
Arming swords and great swords were especially important. They helped the Templars fight well, and knowing about these swords shows their effectiveness in battle.
It also tells us about medieval history and culture, particularly through the evolution of the curved sword. Swords were not just for fighting. They showed status and power. Let’s explore the Templar Knights’ legacy through their famous swords.
Introduction to the Templar Knights and Their Swords
The Templar Knights were a powerful group in the early 12th century. They protected pilgrims going to the Holy Land, making them key players in the Crusades.
They were known for their bravery and commitment to both faith and fighting. Their swords were more than just weapons. They showed the Templars’ dedication to their mission.
The Templars’ swords were famous for their unique designs, which showed their battle skills and values. Today, these swords remind us of the mix of war and faith in the Middle Ages.
The Importance of Swords in the Medieval Era
Swords became vital in the medieval era in war and as status symbols. They were more than just tools; they showed a knight’s or lord’s honor. Each sword was a work of art, made for different fighting needs.
Military swords changed with new battle tactics. They were symbols of power and strength, and having a sword showed one’s authority and respect in society.
Different swords were made for various uses, from fighting to ceremonies. Each type had its role, showing swords’ value in society. Their beauty made them precious beyond their use in battle.
Understanding Different Medieval Sword Types
Medieval swordsmanship gives us a peek into ancient battles. It shows us the different types of medieval swords used back then. Arming swords and longswords are two main types. Each type shows how warriors fought and what worked best in battle, including the use of the longsword and rapier.
Arming Swords: A Core Weapon
Arming swords, such as knightly swords, were vital for knights and soldiers during the medieval period. They have straight, double-edged blades and are 30 to 40 inches long, making them versatile in fights.
They can be used with one hand, allowing warriors to perform attacks and defenses. Their flexibility made them popular in many battles.
Longswords: Versatility in Combat
Longswords have long blades and need two hands to hold. They are 35 to 55 inches long. This design gives warriors more reach and power.
Knights liked longswords for fighting from far away or close. They can do many moves, like thrusting or sweeping. This made longswords very important in battles.
Arming Swords: Characteristics and Usage
Arming swords were key in medieval battles. They were known for their special features and design. Knights loved them for their mix of speed and strength.
Blade Length and Design
Arming swords had blades that were 28 to 32 inches long. This length made them great for many fights. Their straight, double-edged blades were good for both cutting and thrusting.
Some had fuller grooves, enhancing the performance of the broadsword. These made the sword lighter but still strong.
Combat Techniques with Arming Swords
Knights used arming swords in many ways. They were good for both close fights and big battles. Depending on the situation, knights could stab or swing.
Their skill in using these swords made them very effective. This was because of the sword’s design and the knight’s training.
Longswords: The Knightly Weapon of Choice
Longswords became the top choice for knights in medieval times. They changed a lot, showing how design and fighting methods evolved. This change helped knights in different battles, showing how swords and armor tactics grew together.
Evolution from Early to Late Medieval Longswords
The longsword changed from one-handed to two-handed swords over time. Early ones had straight, double-edged blades for thrusting and cutting. As battles changed, so did the sword’s look:
-
Blades got longer for more reach, particularly in the case of the rapier.
-
Blades widened for more substantial cuts, a feature often seen in the broadsword.
-
Hilt designs improved for better grip and power.
Knights used these swords in new ways, mixing attack and defense. They changed their fighting styles to fit the changing battlefields.
Two-Handed Techniques and Styles
Using both hands became key for longsword fighters, especially when wielding a hand-and-a-half sword. This let knights use their swords with more power and accuracy. They used:
-
Intense downward strikes to break armor.
-
Thrusts to hit weak spots in opponents.
-
Smart defensive moves for counter-attacks.
These moves showed a knight’s skill and the growing complexity of sword fighting, particularly with the hand-and-a-half sword. It was all about mixing offense with smart defense.
The Great Sword: A Symbol of Power
The great sword, often a broadsword, shows the power and might of the medieval era. It’s a large two-handed sword of considerable size, which boosts its fighting power and visually indicates its power.
These swords have long blades, 40 to 60 inches long, which allows them to reach far and hit hard.
The great sword is both functional and a symbol of honor. Its design helps in fights. It makes its users look intense and scary on the battlefield.
Historical leaders and knights used these swords. They show the strength and courage needed by leaders. Today, the great sword still shows what it means to be strong and noble.
Other Notable Sword Types Used by Templar Knights
Templar Knights used many swords for different fights. Each sword was key to their success. The bastard sword, short sword, and dagger were significant.
The Bastard Sword: A Hybrid Weapon
The bastard sword was great for many fights. Knights could use it with one or two hands. This made it perfect for changing tactics quickly.
Its length was good for open fights and tight spots. This made it a top choice for many.
The Short Sword: Close Quarters Combat
The short sword was vital for quick battles. Its short blade was perfect for fast strikes and defense. Knights could move quickly around enemies with it.
This helped them hit their targets in tight spaces. It was a vital tool for Templar knights.
The Dagger: A Complementary Blade
The dagger was a key part of Templar gear. It was used for fighting, surprise attacks, and hiding.
Like a small sword in the 16th century, the dagger helped knights keep fighting in tight spots. It showed how important being flexible was for Templar knights.
Medieval Sword Types: A Comprehensive Overview
The 15th-century sword world is vast, with many types of swords, each with special features and uses. This overview looks at medieval swords, focusing on their size, use, and design.
Medieval swords fall into three main groups:
-
Single-edged swords: Great for slashing, these blades are made for cutting. They give warriors good control in battle.
-
Double-edged swords: These versatile swords are good for cutting and thrusting and are used in many battle situations.
-
Thrusting swords: Made for stabbing, these swords have sharp points. They are perfect for piercing.
Knowing about these sword types helps us better understand medieval warfare. It shows how different swords were used in battles and highlights the importance of choosing the proper sword for the job.
This look into medieval English sword types shows how warfare evolved. As battles changed, so did the swords. The variety in sword design, including the hand-and-a-half sword and curved sword, shows their function and the history of swordsmanship.
Specific Features of Templar Swords
Templar swords are known for their mix of function and beauty. They have special pommel designs and different hilt types. Each part was made with care, showing the skill of the sword makers.
Knowing about these features helps us see how Templar knights used their swords. It shows how they fought in battles, reflecting the tactics of the medieval period.
Pommel and Hilt Varieties
The pommel helped balance the sword, making it easier to control. It came in shapes like round or cross, making each sword unique.
Hilts were simple or fancy, showing the owner’s status and style. The work on these hilts ensured the sword felt good in your hand. This was key for fighting well.
Blade Types: Straight vs. Curved
There’s a big difference between straight and curved blades. Straight blades were great for thrusting, while curved blades, like the rapier’s, were better for slashing. The choice depended on the fight and the knight’s style.
This shows the importance of making swords that fit the knight’s needs and highlights the sword makers’ skill.
Sword Tactics and Techniques of the Templar Knights
The Templar Knights were known for their skill in medieval battles. They used advanced sword tactics that set them apart. Their fighting style was not just about strength. It also included smart strategies and understanding combat.
They often fought in lines, which helped them attack and defend well. This way, their swords could attack from different sides, making them hard to beat.
The Templar Knights were also great at both attacking and defending. They would block an enemy’s strike and then quickly attack back. This showed their skill in sword fighting, helping them stay calm in battle using a knightly sword.
-
The use of feints creates openings for a decisive strike.
-
Employing thrusts as well as slashes to keep opponents guessing.
-
Executing quick, targeted strikes aimed at vulnerable points in armor.
The Templar Knights’ fighting style was shaped by their chivalric code, which valued honor and skill. Knights were trained in physical and mental strategies, making them strong opponents for centuries.
The Role of Swords in Templar Warfare
Swords were vital for the Templar Knights in battles. In medieval times, swords were the primary weapon. The Templars trained hard to master these swords, becoming skilled in sword fighting.
Combat Strategies and Sword-Fighting Styles
Templar Knights devised smart battle plans. They used swords for both attacking and defending. Their training made them fast and robust in close fights.
They learned different sword styles for different battles. These styles included:
-
Thrusting Techniques: Aimed at penetrating enemy defenses.
-
Slice and Cut: Focusing on quick, decisive blows to incapacitate opponents.
-
Defensive Posturing: Utilizing the sword to block and counter enemy strikes.
These styles showed how swords were versatile. They also showed the Templars’ deep battle tactics.
Influence of Military Training on Swordsmanship
Templar Knights got tough training. It made them great with swords. Their training included:
-
Physical Conditioning: Building strength and endurance for prolonged combat.
-
Drills and Sparring: Practicing techniques and strategies against peers.
-
Situational Awareness: Training to respond swiftly to the chaos of battle.
This hard training made Templar Knights skilled in sword fighting. They could use their swords well in battles. They were also good at finding their enemies’ weak spots.
Summary
Medieval swords, especially those of the Templar Knights, show a deep history and culture of the medieval period. These swords were more than just weapons. They stood for the values and skills of a knightly order.
The swords, like the arming and longsword, show how warfare changed in the Middle Ages. They helped define what it meant to be a knight.
The Templar Knights used different swords to show their strength and dedication. These swords are a big part of medieval life. They show both the practical and ceremonial sides of knighthood.
As we learn more about these swords, our interest in them grows. They have a big impact on how we see martial traditions today.
Learning about Templar swords helps us see their importance in history. Their legacy inspires us to think about medieval combat and honor, making their story important in today’s discussions of chivalry and war.

Knights Templar Movies List You’ll Adore
Immerse yourself in tales of chivalry, religious fervor, and hidden treasures with this curated Knights Templar movies list. These films offer a fascinating look at the legendary order of the Knights Templar, showcasing their zeal, bravery, and mystique. From historical dramas to conspiracy thrillers, these movies about Knights Templar cater to a broad spectrum of cinematic tastes.
Top Knight Templar Movies for History Buffs
‘Kingdom of Heaven’ (2005)
Ridley Scott’s epic historical drama is essential to any Knights Templar movies list. Although the film focuses on the life of a blacksmith who becomes a knight during the Crusades, the Templar Knights feature prominently with their iconic red cross emblazoned on white cloaks. The movie is filled with epic battles and provides an in-depth look at the religious and political turmoil of the period.
‘Arn: The Knight Templar’ (2007)
A Swedish epic based on Jan Guillou’s trilogy, this film offers a detailed perspective on the life of a Knight Templar. Arn, a devoutly religious young man, is sent to become a Knight Templar as penance for a forbidden love. The film’s authentic depiction of the Templar’s lifestyle and the harsh realities of the medieval world make it one of the best Knights Templar movies for history enthusiasts.
Knights Templar in Fantasy and Adventure Genres
‘Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade’ (1989)
Although not a traditional Knights Templar movie, the third installment in the Indiana Jones series weaves the Templar mythology into its adventurous plot. The film revolves around the quest for the Holy Grail, a relic heavily associated with the Templars. The movie’s combination of action, archaeology, and Templar lore makes it a captivating watch.
‘National Treasure’ (2004)
This modern classic adventure film starring Nicolas Cage is a must-watch for fans of conspiracy theories and treasure hunts. The movie delves into the alleged connection between the Knights Templar, the Freemasons, and the founding of the United States, resulting in an entertaining journey full of puzzles and secret codes.
Best Knights Templar Movies for Conspiracy Thriller Lovers
‘The Da Vinci Code’ (2006)
Based on Dan Brown’s bestselling novel, this movie unfolds an intricate web of secrets, conspiracies, and mysteries related to the Knights Templar. The plot dives into the Templar’s alleged hidden knowledge and connection to the Holy Grail, making it one of the best Knights Templar movies for those who love suspense and intrigue.
‘Solomon Kane’ (2009)
In this dark fantasy adventure, Solomon Kane, a ruthless mercenary in the 16th century, renounces violence to live a peaceful life. However, when a dark power threatens his world, he becomes a formidable warrior once more. The movie’s Templar subplot and its exploration of repentance and redemption add depth to the narrative.
Lesser-Known Gems in the Knights Templar Movies List
‘Ironclad’ (2011)
Set during the siege of Rochester Castle in the 13th century, this movie offers a gritty, realistic depiction of medieval warfare. The film’s central character is a Templar Knight who leads the defense of the castle against King John of England. Ironclad’ stands out for its intense battle sequences and nuanced portrayal of a Templar Knight’s life.
‘The Last Templar’ (2009)
This made-for-TV movie is based on Raymond Khoury’s novel. The plot revolves around an archaeologist and an FBI agent uncovering a conspiracy related to the Knights Templar after a heist at a New York City museum. ‘The Last Templar’ provides a thrilling ride combining historical intrigue and modern crime-solving.
Knights Templar Documentaries for the Fact Seekers
‘The Templar Code’ (2005)
For those who prefer facts over fiction, ‘The Templar Code’ is an excellent documentary to watch. It dives deep into the origins, rise, and fall of the Knights Templar, providing a comprehensive look at this enigmatic order.
‘The Lost Relics of the Knights Templar’ (2020)
This documentary series follows two treasure hunters on a global quest to find the lost relics of the Templars. It provides fascinating insights into the legendary order and hidden treasures, making it a worthwhile addition to your Knights Templar movies list.
Knights Templar in Animation: A Look at ‘The Last Knight’ (2017)
Animation has the power to bring history to life in vibrant, imaginative ways. The Last Knight’ (2017), an animated feature, does just this by delving into the world of the Knights Templar. The film, while fictional, draws on historical elements to craft a captivating story, making it an intriguing entry in the Knights Templar movies list.
The Last Knight’ centers around a young boy, Leo, who is unexpectedly thrust into a grand adventure when he discovers he is the last living descendant of the Knights Templar. This revelation kickstarts his quest to uncover the hidden secrets of the Templars and fulfill his destiny.
The animation style of ‘The Last Knight’ is beautifully rendered, combining a modern aesthetic with period-accurate designs, helping to create a visually stunning and immersive Templar world. Despite the film’s historical underpinnings, it also incorporates elements of fantasy and magic, keeping in line with the mystique surrounding the Templars.
One of the key strengths of ‘The Last Knight’ lies in its ability to make the Templars accessible to a younger audience. It accomplishes this through its use of animation and its adventurous narrative while respecting the Templars’ history and legacy. This film is not just a fun romp for kids but also serves as an engaging entry point into the rich and complex world of the Knights Templar.
The Templars and the Supernatural: Decoding ‘Season of the Witch’ (2011)
Dominic Sena’s ‘Season of the Witch’ (2011) offers a unique blend of historical drama and supernatural horror, depicting the Knights Templar in a way that diverges from traditional representations. This film centers on two Templar knights, Behmen and Felson, played by Nicolas Cage and Ron Perlman, who find themselves entangled in a terrifying mission involving witchcraft and demonic possession.
Season of the Witch’ deviates from the Templar canon by overlaying the historical backdrop of the 14th century and the Crusades with supernatural elements. The knights, disenchanted with the Holy Church’s brutalities, desert their posts only to be roped into escorting an alleged witch to a remote monastery. This witch is believed to be the source of the Black Plague, adding an extra layer of historical context.
The film marries Templar valor and chivalry with chilling supernatural themes, further heightened by the medieval atmospheric setting. The knights’ struggle with their faith, their disillusionment with the Church, and their final stand against evil forces make ‘Season of the Witch’ an interesting exploration of the Templars’ mythos. Despite its mixed reviews, this movie provides an intriguing spin on the Templar narrative, making it worth watching for those interested in the melding of history and horror.
The Templars and the Modern World: Unraveling ‘Assassin’s Creed’ (2016)
In the modern cinematic adaptation of the wildly popular video game series, ‘Assassin’s Creed’ presents a fresh interpretation of the Knights Templar’s legacy. The film injects the Templar Order directly into the heart of the modern world, portraying them as the shadowy and powerful Abstergo Industries. Their quest for control and obsession with the Apple of Eden, an ancient artifact of immense power, drives the film’s plot.
The movie cleverly interweaves the historical aspects of the Templars with a contemporary narrative, creating a thrilling cat-and-mouse chase across time. Through the use of revolutionary technology, the protagonist, Callum Lynch, experiences the adventures of his ancestor, Aguilar, a member of the Assassins Brotherhood during the Spanish Inquisition. The Brotherhood is shown as the age-old adversary of the Templars, highlighting the struggle between control (Templars) and freedom (Assassins).
While the film isn’t strictly about the Knights Templar in their historical context, it innovatively extends the Templar mythos into the realm of sci-fi and action. Assassin’s Creed’ is a fascinating exploration of the Templars’ influence, echoing their themes of power, control, and secrecy in a modern setting.
The Templar Legacy: Understanding Their Impact through Film and Television
The Knights Templar, a medieval Catholic military order, has left an indelible mark on popular culture. Their rich history, full of heroism, betrayal, and enigma, has inspired countless filmmakers and television producers. By exploring their enduring legacy, we can better understand their influence on modern media.
Film and television have played a crucial role in shaping our perception of the Templars. They have depicted them as brave warriors, religious zealots, guardians of holy relics, and even secret society members with hidden knowledge. Movies like ‘Kingdom of Heaven’ and TV series like ‘Knightfall’ offer realistic portrayals, painting the Templars as multi-faceted figures influenced by their time’s political and religious turmoil.
On the other hand, films such as ‘National Treasure’ and ‘The Da Vinci Code’ tap into the Templars’ more mysterious aspects, linking them to conspiracies and hidden treasures. Even in the realm of fantasy, as in ‘Assassin’s Creed,’ the Templars’ influence is clear, representing themes of control and power.
Regardless of the genre, the Templars’ portrayal in film and television continues to captivate audiences worldwide. Through these portrayals, we can appreciate the Templar legacy’s depth and impact on our collective imagination.
Conclusion
Whether you’re a history enthusiast, a fan of fantasy and adventure, a lover of conspiracy thrillers, or a seeker of factual knowledge, there’s a Knights Templar movie for you. This list encompasses some of the best Knights Templar movies that delve into the order’s rich history, legends, and mysteries, offering a blend of education and entertainment. So grab some popcorn, dim the lights, and step into the world of the Knights Templar – a world of courage, faith, secrets, and treasures.
The Middle Ages saw the development of new modes of warfare encompassing both pitched battles and siege warfare. Then as now the western world was engaged in an arms race. New weapons technology prompted new defensive technologies, for example the introduction of cross-bows led quickly to the adoption of plate armour rather than chain mail.
During the Dark Ages Christendom had largely abandoned the sophisticated techniques of Classical times, arguing that anything not mentioned in the bible was of satanic origin and that God would ensure victory for his faithful followers.
Along with the scientific advances, military techniques had been abandoned and forgotten. This affected building as well as weaponry. For example the Greeks and Romans had used iron ties to join blocks of stone together. Knowing the effects of rust they encased the iron in lead so that it did not rust, and stonework using this technique survives intact today. Medieval builders did not know about the lead protection and used iron ties that rusted, expanded and fractured the surrounding stone.
So it was with military engines like the balista and military techniques like the Romans' famous tortoise. So too, ancient techniques for making quick-setting concrete and prefabricated defences were forgotten.
To some extent the development of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment is the story of the rediscovery of ancient techniques.
Preparations for Medieval Battle
Medieval Pitched Battles
Medieval Fortifications
Medieval Siege Warfare
Medieval Water Supplies
Medieval Supplies and Logistics
Medieval Equipment & Weapons
Medieval Weapons Technology
Medieval Communications
Medieval Military Organisation
Medieval Women at War
Balista - a Roman artillery weapon rediscovered in the late Middle Ages
Preparations for Medieval Battles
For larger battles, planning typically consisted of a council of the war leaders, which could either be the commander laying down a plan or a debate between the different leaders, depending on how much authority the commander possessed.
Often decisions were dictated by the Church and formulated for religious rather than military reasons. This explains for example some of the worst disasters suffered by crusaders armies during the Crusades where senior clergy in command of armies routinely ignored advice from seasoned commanders.
Click here for Battle Ready Medieval Swords and Armors
Medieval Pitched Battles
Infantry, including missile troops, would typically be employed at the outset of the battle to break open infantry formations. Cavalry attempted to defeat the enemy cavalry.
Once one side coaxed their opposing infantry into breaking formation, the cavalry would be deployed in attempt to exploit the loss of cohesion in the opposing infantry lines and begin slaying the infantrymen from horse top.
Once a break in the lines was exploited, the cavalry became instrumental to victory - causing further breakage in the lines and wreaking havoc amongst the infantrymen, as it is much easier to kill a man from the top of a horse than to stand on the ground and face a half-ton destrier carrying an armed knight.
Until a significant break in the enemy infantry lines arose, the cavalry could not be used to much effect against infantry since horses are not easily harried into a wall of pikemen. Pure infantry conflicts would be drawn-out affairs.
A hasty retreat could cause greater casualties than an organized withdrawal, because the fast cavalry of the winning side's rearguard would intercept the fleeing enemy while their infantry continued their attack.
In most medieval battles, more soldiers were killed during the retreat than in battle, since mounted knights could quickly and easily dispatch the archers and infantry who were no longer protected by a line of pikes as they had been during the previous fighting.
A medieval pitched battle
Medieval Fortifications
Breakdowns in centralized states led to the rise of a number of groups that turned to large-scale pillage as a source of income. Most notably the Vikings, Arabs, Mongols and Magyars raided significantly. As these groups were generally small and needed to move quickly, building fortifications was a good way to provide refuge and protection for the people and the wealth in the region.
These fortifications evolved over the course of the Middle Ages, the most important form being the castle, a structure which has become synonymous with the Medieval era to many.
The castle served as a protected place for the local elites. Inside a castle they were protected from bands of raiders and could send mounted warriors to drive the raiders from the area, or to disrupt the efforts of larger armies to supply themselves in the region by gaining local superiority over foraging parties that would be impossible against the whole enemy host.
Fortifications provided safety to the lord, his family, his servants and his local vassals. They provided refuge from armies too large to face in open battle. Heavy cavalry which dominate an open battle was useless against fortifications.
Building siege engines was a time-consuming process, and could seldom be effectively done without preparations before the campaign. Sieges could take months, or even years, to weaken or demoralize the defenders sufficiently.
Herstmonceux Castle
Machicolations
Medieval Siege Warfare
In the Medieval period besieging armies used a wide variety of siege engines including: scaling ladders; battering rams; siege towers and various types of catapults such as the mangonel, onager, ballista, and trebuchet. Siege techniques also included mining.
Advances in the prosecution of sieges encouraged the development of a variety of defensive counter-measures. In particular, medieval fortifications became progressively stronger — for example, the advent of the concentric castle from the period of the Crusades — and more dangerous to attackers as witnessed by the increasing use of machicolations and murder-holes, as well the preparation of hot or incendiary substances. Arrow slits, concealed doors for sallies, and deep water wells were also integral to resisting siege.
Designers of castles paid particular attention to defending entrances, protecting gates with drawbridges, portcullises and barbicans. Wet skins of freshly slaughtered animals were draped over gates, hourdes and other wooden structures to retard fire. Moats and other water defences, whether natural or augmented, were also vital to defenders.
In the European Middle Ages, virtually all large cities had city walls. Carcassonne and Dubrovnik in Dalmatia are well-preserved examples. The more important cities had citadels, forts or castles inside them, often built against the city walls. Great effort was expended to ensure a good water supply inside the city in case of siege. In some cases, long tunnels were constructed to carry water into the city. Complex systems of underground tunnels were used for storage and communications in medieval cities like Tábor in Bohemia.
Attackers would try to get over the walls using scaling ladders, siege towers called belfries, and grapples. Alternatively they could try to get through the doors using a battering ram, or through the walls using heavy artillery. They might try tunnelling under the walls to gain access, but more often they would try to undermine the walls to bring them down.
In a siege one army typically attacks an enemy within a stronghold. either a castle or a fortified town. Medieval towns were generally surrounded by defensive walls, just like castles. Indeed the distinction between castles and fortified towns is often blurred. Castles were often located within fortified towns - in fact many towns grew up around existing castles - so that the castle became a sort of citadel within the fortified town.
Plan of Carcassonne - you can see the castle (chateau comtal) within the city walls. The odd external feature was a stairway down to the River Aude.
Attackers therefore often had two sets of obstacles - first the city walls, then the castle walls. This could lead to interesting complications as at Beaucaire in 1216. For months Simon de Montfort besieged Raymondet in the town, while Raymondet besieged a garrison loyal to de Montfort in the castle within the town.
Sometimes there were three sets of obstacles, because fauxburgs with their own defensive walls were often built on to the exterior of city walls, as at Carcassonne and Termes.
Besiegers had a number of techniques for gaining control of their objective - either by forcing a way in, or by forcing the besieged garrison out. Specific techniques - established since prehistoric times - include:
-
breaching the walls or doorways. Attackers would use weapons to get through walls. Examples are stone throwing machines petriers such as trebuchets and mangonels); machines to knock holes in walls such as battering rams; and engines to extract individual dressed stones one by one (cats, weasels and simple picks).
-
tunelling under the walls. Attackers would build mines, either to gain access to the interior or to undermine and collapse the defensive walls.
-
getting over the walls. Attackers would use scaling ladders and siege engines such as large mobile wooden towers known as belfries.
-
sitting and waiting. If communications between the besieged and the outside world could be cut then the defenders could be denied food supplies and sometimes water (as at Beaucaire, Carcassonne, Minerve, and Termes). This was not always possible (as for Raymondet at Beaucaire and at Montsegur). The word siege means "to sit", an indication that this was a standard technique.
-
A Fifth Column. Inducing someone on the inside to assist the attackers, either by bribery or exploiting divided loyalties. They could for example open a postern gate at night. Occasionally attackers could be smuggled in to the besieged fortification to fulfil this role, as for example in ancient times in the famous Trojan horse.
-
Diplomacy, threats, terror and psychological techniques. To help weaken the will of the defenders, attackers could make threats or promises, or terrorise the defenders - for example by mutilating or executing hostages, or by using throwing machines to lob fire, or human heads or other body parts, into the the fortification.
-
Biological Warfare. Medieval besiegers were known to project diseased animals into fortifications with the deliberate intention of spreading disease and so weakening the garisson. I some cases it was possible to poison water supplies, though most fortifications had their own wells or water cisterns.
Until the invention of gunpowder-based weapons (and the resulting higher-velocity projectiles), the balance of power and logistics definitely favoured the defender. With the invention of gunpowder, the traditional methods of defence became less and less effective against a determined siege, giving rise to a new form of defensive structure, the star-fort.
Working trebuchet at Château des Baux
The Siege of a Castle, Hartlet, Dorothy and Elliot, Margaret M.: “Life and Work of the People of England: The Fourteenth Century” (1929)
The Siege of Damietta
The Second Siege Of Acre, 1291
Philippe Augustus, King of France, recieves the keys of a surrendered city from two of the inhabitants.
Siege Towers (Belfries, Belfrois)
A wheeled belfry with its own battlements
The medieval belfry was not a church tower, but a siege engine - the modern meaning seemsto have come about by the erroneous association of towers and bells (etymologically, the bel in belfry is not connected with the word "bell").
A belfry was used for gaining access to a castle, generally at the level of the battlements. It was typically constructed in wood, on several stories - as many as necessary to reach the battlements. Each story offered a location for attack - bows and crossbows in the lower levels, and armed men in the upper level, ready to drop a sort of drawbridge and gain access to the castle ramparts. The belfry was normally wheeled, so that it could be moved up against the castle walls, and like all exposed wooden engines of war it would be covered in the hides of freshly slaughtered animals and regularly dowsed in water to keep it fireproof.
One way to foil the approach of a belfry was to have sloping castle walls. This forced the attackers to cover a greater distance from the top of the belfry to the top of the castle wall. This was one of the benefits of a talus.
Another way to foil the approach was to build ditches and moats to prevent the approach of belfries.
As on the right, attackers often needed to fill up the ditch or moat to provide a level surface that extended all the way to the foot of the castle wall.
In practice, all sorts of material was used for this: earth, rocks, straw, dead bodies, wood, whatever came to hand. If too much wood was used in the infill then the infill itself became a target for fire setters.
A covered belfry crossing an infilled dry moat, with a boarding party crossing the lowered drawbridge
Battering Rams
A battering ram is a siege engine originating in ancient times to breach fortification walls or doors. In its simplest form, a battering ram is just a large, heavy log carried by several people and propelled with force against the target, the momentum of the ram damaging the target.
Some battering rams were supported by rollers. This gave the ram much greater travel so that it could achieve a greater speed before striking its target and was therefore more destructive. Such a ram was used by Alexander the Great
In a more sophisticated design, the ram was slung from a wheeled support frame so that it could be much more massive and also more easily swung against its target. Sometimes the ram's attacking point would be reinforced with a metal head. A capped ram is a battering ram that has an accessory at the head (usually made of iron or steel, traditionally shaped into the head and horns of a ram to do more damage to a building.
Many battering rams had protective roofs and side-screens covered in materials, often fresh wet hides to prevent the ram being set on fire, as well as to protect the ram's operators of the ram from enemies firing arrows down on them.
An image of an Assyrian battering ram shows how sophisticated attack and defence had come by the 9th century BC. In the image defenders are trying to set the ram alight with torches and have also put a chain under the ram. The attackers are trying to pull on the chain to free the ram - the same scene could have been depicted in Roman, Visigothic or Medieval times.
When a castle was being attacked, defenders attempted to foil battering rams by dropping obstacles in front of the ram just before it hit a wall, using grappling hooks to immobilize the log, setting the ram on fire, or sallying out to attack the ram. Battering rams had an important effect on the evolution of defensive walls - the talus for example was one way of reinforcing walls. In practice, wooden gates would generally offer the easiest targets.
Battering ram - covered for protection
Raymondet, the future Raymond VII, Count of Toulouse, used a ram at Beaucaire in 1216. He was himself besieged in the town by Simon de Montfort's Crusader forces, while he himself was besieging the garisson of the castle within the fortified town. The The Song of the Crusade (the Canso) tells us a little about the ram. We know for example that it had an iron head. The poet tells us that it was
"... long, straight, sharp and shod with iron; it thrust, carved and smashed till the wall was breached and many of the dressed stones thrown down. When the besieged Crusaders saw that, they did not panic but made a rope lasso and used a device to fling it so that they caught and held the ram's head, to the rage of all in Beaucaire.
Then the engineer who had set up the battering ram arrived. He and his men slipped secretly into the rock itself [presumably the hole already made by the ram, intending to break through the wall with their sharp picks. But when the men in the keep realised this, they cast down fire, sulphur and tow together in a piece of cloth and let it down on a chain.
When the fire caught and the sulphur ran, the flames and stench so stupefied them that not one of them could stay there. Then they used their stone throwers and broke down the beams and palisades." (The Song of the Crusade, laisse 164).
Battering ram - covered for protection and wheeled to move it up to the wall
Battering ram at Château des Baux, France
Battering ram in action
The Cat
A Cat was a wooden structure built (or moved) up to a defensive wall. From surviving documents it seems that an arm could manipulated to claw away at the castle wall - hence the name.
Cats could be large multi-purpose structures, perhaps with a trebuchet on top and sappers operating from the protected interior.
Cats were much feared and if they possibly could, castle defenders would try to destroy them by mounting sorties, by using stone throwing engines, or by setting fire to them.
Like all wooden siege engines they would be routinely covered in the skins of freshly slaughtered animals and regularly dowsed with water to keep them fireproof.
Simon de Montfort used a cat at the Siege of Beaucaire in 1216, but unsuccessfully. According to the Canso it had "no more effect than an enchanter's dream". It was "a spider's web and a sheer waste of material".
Perhaps the most famous cat was one Simon built two years later, attempting to besiege the City of Toulouse in 1217-18. It was while protecting his cat from counter attack by the citizens of Toulouse that Simon de Montfort was struck on the head by a massive stone projectile from a trebuchet on the city walls, and killed instantly.
The Weasel
A weasel was a similar sort of structure to a cat, but smaller and lighter. It seems to have been more manoeuvrable and used a spike rather than a paw to attack castle walls.
It may have taken its name from its business end looking like a weasel's nose, or perhaps its long thin body, or both.
A weasel was used by the forces of Raymondet, the future Count Raymond VII of Toulouse, at Beaucaire in 1216 according to the The Song of the Crusade (Canso de la crozada). As Simon de Montfort was conducting a Council of War, a beggar burst in, shouting that he had seen a weasel. The weasel was already against the citadel wall and ready to drive a spike into it. The defenders were quick to react. The chief engineer hurled a pot of molten pitch at it, hitting it in exactly the right spot and it burst into flames.
A Cat depicted at Carcassonne
Chemical Weapons - Greek Fire
Incendiary devices were standard weapons of war. Wooden defences always needed protection from burning. Wet animal hides were highly effective against burning arrows so military engineers dedicated themselves to finding ways of ensuring that fires burned as long and as strongly as necessary to catch. All sorts of chemicals could be used for this purpose - petroleum, sulphur, quicklime and tar barrels for example.
Liquid fire is represented on Assyrian bas-reliefs. At the siege of Plataea in 429 BC the Spartans attempted to burn the town by piling up against the walls wood saturated with pitch and sulphur and setting it on fire, and at the siege of Delium in 424 BC a cauldron containing pitch, sulphur and burning charcoal was placed against the walls. A century later Aeneas Tacticus mentions a mixture of sulphur, pitch, charcoal, incense and tow packed in wooden vessels, ignited and thrown onto the decks of enemy ships. Formulae given by Vegetius around AD 350 add naphtha or petroleum. Some nine centuries later the same substances are found and later recipes include saltpetre and turpentine make their appearance. The ultimate in this form of chemical warfare was called Greek-Fire.
Greek fire was a burning-liquid used as a weapon of war by the Byzantines, and also by Arabs, Chinese, and Mongols. Incendiary weapons had been in use for centuries: petroleum and sulphur had both been in use since the early days of the Christianity. Greek fire was vastly more potent. Similar to modern napalm, it would adhere to surfaces, ignite upon contact, and could not be extinguished by water alone.
Byzantines used it in naval battles to great effect because it burned on water. It was responsible for numerous Byzantine military victories on land as well as at sea - and also for enemies preferring discretion to valour so that many battles never took place at all. It was the ultimate deterrent of the time, and helps explain the Byzantine Empire's survival until 1453. There was no defence. As the Lord of Joinville noted in the thirteenth century "Every time they hurl the fire at us, we go down on our elbows and knees, and beseech Our Lord to save us from this danger." Men were known to simply flee their posts rather than face Greek Fire. On the other hand Greek fire was very hard to control, and it would often accidentally set Byzantine ships ablaze.
Greek Fire is said to have been invented by a Syrian Engineer, one Callinicus or Kallinikos, a refugee from Maalbek, or an architect from Heliopolis in the Byzantine Province of Judaea, in the seventh century (673 AD). The formula for Greek fire was a closely guarded secret and it remains a mystery to this day.
The term Greek Fire was not attributed to it until the time of the European Crusades. Some of the original names include Liquid Fire, Marine Fire, Artificial Fire and Roman Fire. (Muslims against whom the weapon was used called the Byzantines Romans).
The weapon was first used by the Byzantine navy, and the most common method of deployment was to squirt it through a large bronze tube onto enemy ships. Usually the mixture would be stored in heated, pressurised barrels and projected through the tube by some sort of pump, operators being protected behind large iron shields. Byzantines used Greek Fire only rarely, apparently out of fear that the secret mixture might fall into enemy hands. The loss of the secret would be a greater loss to Byzantium then the loss of any single battle.
In 678 the Byzantines utterly destroyed a Muslim fleet - over 30,000 men were lost. In 717-718 Caliph Suleiman attacked Constantinople (Byzantium). Most of the Muslim fleet was once again destroyed by Greek Fire, and the Caliph was forced to flee. There is virtually no documentation of its usage after this time by the Byzantines and it is generally believed that it was during this era that the secret of creating Greek Fire was lost. Formulae used after this date never seems to have had the same devastating effect.
Some form of Greek Fire continued to be used for centuries. Byzantines used it against the Venetians during the Fourth Crusade. A so-called "carcass composition" containing sulphur, tallow, rosin, turpentine, saltpetre and antimony, became known to the Crusaders as Greek fire but is more correctly called wildfire.
So far, no-one has been able to recreate Greek Fire. Arabian armies, who eventually created their own version sometime between the mid-seventh century and the early tenth. It was relatively weak copy of the original Byzantine substance, though still one of the most devastating weapons of the period. Arabs used the Greek Fire much like Byzantines, using brass tubes mounted aboard ships or on castle walls. They also filled jars with it, to be hurled by hand at their opponents. Arrows and javelins would be used to carry the mixture further and engines of war could be used to throw larger amounts over castle walls.
As a defence, water alone was ineffective. On land sand could be used to stop the burning . Intriguingly it is also known that vinegar and urine were effective - suggesting an alkaline composition that could be neutralised by acid. According to some accounts pure or salt water served to intensify the burning, suggesting that Greek Fire may have been a 'thermite-like' reaction, perhaps involving quicklime. According to some sources, Greek Fire burst into flames on contact with water. Some have suggested phosphorus, Others have suggested a form of naphtha or another low-density liquid hydrocarbon (petroleum was already known in the East). There are numerous candidates including liquid petroleum, naphtha, burning pitch, sulphur, resin, quicklime and bitumen, along with a hypothetical unknown "secret ingredient". The exact composition is unlikely ever to be deduced from the inadequate surviving records.
It is not clear from contemporary reports if the operator ignited the mixture with a flame as it emerged from the syringe, or if it ignited spontaneously on contact with water or air. If the latter is the case, it is possible that the active ingredient was calcium phosphide, made by heating lime, bones, and charcoal. On contact with water, calcium phosphide releases phosphine, which ignites spontaneously. The reaction of quicklime with water also creates enough heat to ignite hydrocarbons, especially if an oxidiser such as saltpetre is present.
Ingredients were apparently preheated in a cauldron, and then pumped through a pump or used in hand grenades. If a pyrophoric reaction was involved, perhaps these grenades contained chambers for the fluids, which mixed and ignited when the vessel broke on impact with the target.
More information
Professor J.R. Partington, A History of the Greek Fire and Gunpowder, Heffer, 1960.
Greek fire was not the only Chemical Weapon. Poisoned arrows could be employed and in the late medieval period gunpowder became common.
Biological Weapons
Medieval warriors also used basic biological weapons, for example catapulting dead and diseased animals into a defended fortress to help spread disease.
Psychological Weapons
Ancient armies had used sophisticated psychological weapons. For example would have mad armour suitable for a man of several times normal size. He would then leave a few samples laying around the scene of his victories against the Persians. After he had gone Persians would find this armour and were were soon spreading stories of Alexander's superhuman giant soldiers.
Christendom did not stretch to this level of sophistication, but it did engage in some psychological warfare, spreading rumours for example, sometimes with success effectively turning a military defeat into a political victory. Other examples of psychological warfare include making loud noises (an old Celtic practice) and catapulting the severed heads of captured enemies back into the enemy camp.
Defenders in castles under siege might prop up dummies beside the walls to make it look like there were more defenders than there really were. They might throw food from the walls to show besiegers that provisions were plentiful (Dame Carcas, who saw off the Franks, supposedly gave her name to Carcassonne after feeding the last few scraps of food in the besieged city to the last pig and then tossing over the walls as a present to the Franks. As intended, they deduced that their siege was useless and raised it the next day).
Firearms provided a strong psychological benefit when they were introduced, even though their rate of fire rendered them almost useless - and their users often blew themselves up rather than the enemy - literally hoist by their own petard.
Napalm, the modern equivalent of Greek Fire, deployed by the US navy during the Vietnam war much as the Byzantine navy deployed Greek Fire
A contemporary account of the Byzantines in action:
[The Byzantine Emperor Alexios] had fixed to the bows of each of his galleys a tube ending in the head of a lion or other beast wrought in brass or iron, 'so that the animals might seem to vomit flames'. The fleet came up with the Pisans between Rhodes and Patara, but as its vessels were pursuing them with too great zeal it could not attack as a single body. The first to reach the enemy was the Byzantine admiral Landulph, who shot off his fire too hastily, missed his mark and accomplished nothing. But Count Eleemon, who was the next to close, had better fortune; he rammed the stern of a Pisan vessel, so that the bows of his ship got stuck in its steering-oar tackle. Then, shooting forth the fire, he set it ablaze, after which he pushed off and successfully discharged his tube into three other vessels, all of which were soon in flames. The Pisans then fled in disorder, 'having had no previous knowledge of the device, and wondering that fire, which usually burns upwards, could be directed downwards or to either hand, at the will of the engineer who discharged it'. That the Greek fire was a liquid, and not merely an inflammable substance attached to ordinary missiles, after the manner of fire-arrows, is quite clear from the fact that Leo [VI the Wise] proposes to cast it on the enemy in fragile earthen vessels which may break and allow the material to run about—as also from the name pyr enygron or 'liquid fire' which Anna uses for it.
C.W.C. Oman paraphrasing an account by Alexios's daughter Anna Comnena (1083–1153) about a sea battle between the Pisans and Byzantines near Rhodes in the year 1103.
The Lord of Joinville, a thirteenth century French nobleman, mentions Greek Fire during the seventh Crusade:
It happened one night, whilst we were keeping night-watch over the tortoise-towers, that they brought up against us an engine called a perronel (which they had not done before) and filled the sling of the engine with Greek fire. When that good knight, Lord Walter of Cureil, who was with me, saw this, he spoke to us as follows: "Sirs, we are in the greatest peril that we have ever yet been in. For, if they set fire to our turrets and shelters, we are lost and burnt; and if, again, we desert our defences which have been entrusted to us, we are disgraced; so none can deliver us from this peril save God alone. My opinion and advice therefor is: that every time they hurl the fire at us, we go down on our elbows and knees, and beseech Our Lord to save us from this danger.
So soon as they flung the first shot, we went down on our elbows and knees, as he had instructed us; and their first shot passed between the two turrets, and lodged just in front of us, where they had been raising the dam. Our firemen were all ready to put out the fire; and the Saracens, not being able to aim straight at them, on account of the two penthouse wings which the King had made, shot straight up into the clouds, so that the fire-darts fell right on top of them.
This was the fashion of the Greek fire: it came on as broad in front as a vinegar cask, and the tail of fire that trailed behind it was as big as a great spear; and it made such a noise as it came, that it sounded like the thunder of heaven. It looked like a dragon flying through the air. Such a bright light did it cast, that one could see all over the camp as though it were day, by reason of the great mass of fire, and the brilliance of the light that it shed.
Thrice that night they hurled the Greek fire at us, and four times shot it from the tourniquet cross-bow.
spraying Greek Fire
Spraying Greek Fire (detail)
Mining, Undermining Defensive Walls
A"mine" was a tunnel dug to destabilise and bring down castles and other fortifications. The technique could be used only when the fortification was not built on solid rock. It was developed as a response to stone built castles that could not be burned like earlier-style wooden forts.
A tunnel would be excavated under the outer defences either to provide access into the fortification or more often to collapse the walls. These tunnels were supported by temporary wooden props as the digging progressed, just as in any mine. Once the excavation was complete, the mine was filled with combustible material. When lit it would burn away the props leaving the structure above unsupported and liable to collapse.
To save effort attackers would start the digging as near as possible to the wall or tower to be undermined. This exposed the sappers to enemy fire so it was necessary to provide some sort of defence. Pierre des Vaux de Cernay recounts that at the siege of Carcassonne in 1209, during the Cathar wars (Albigensian Crusade),
"... after the top of the wall had been somewhat weakened by bombardment from petraries, our engineers succeeded with great difficulty in bringing a four-wheeled wagon, covered in oxhides, close to the wall, from which they set to work to sap the wall" (Historia Albigensis - Pierre des Vaux de Cernay, 53).
Successful sapping usually ended the battle since either the defenders would no longer be able to defend and surrender, or the attackers would simply charge in and engage the defenders in close combat.
There were several methods to resist under mining. Often the siting of a castle would be such as to make mining difficult. The walls of a castle could be constructed either on solid rock or water-logged land making it difficult to dig mines. A very deep ditch or moat could be constructed in front of the walls, or even an artificial. This makes it more difficult to dig a mine and even if a breach is made the ditch or moat makes exploiting the breach difficult.
The defenders could also dig counter mines. From these they could then either dig into the attackers tunnels and sortie into them to either kill the sappers or to set fire to the pit-props to collapse the attackers' tunnel. Alternatively they could undermine the attackers' tunnel to collapse it.
If the walls were breached they could either place obstacles in the breach for example a chevaux de frise to hinder an attack, or construct a coupure.
The practice has left us reminders in English. "undermining" has acquired figurative as well as literal meanings. And military engineers are still known as Sappers.
Breaching a castle wall did not automatically signal victory. There are examples, some from the Cathar Wars, of attackers succeeding in breaching a wall but then being forced to retreat, and the defenders improvising further defences to protect the weak spot. (as illustrated below)
Water Supplies
Water was essential to any army and the defence of any stronghold. Wherever practical castles were built on the site of natural springs but that was not always possible.
Where it was not, much effort went into digging wells or aqueducts (sometimes subterranean), or massive cisterns.
Many of the castles that fell during the Cathar Wars did so because of a shortage of water, including Termes and Carcassonne. The illustration on the left shows a massive defensive structure built at Carcassonne to ensure a water supply and access to the River Aude.
Supplies and Logistics
The usual method for solving logistical problems for smaller armies was foraging or "living off the land" - effectively stealing whatever was needed: animals, crops, wood and so on.
The normal "campaign season" corresponded to the seasons of the year when there would be food on the ground and relatively good weather. This season was usually from spring to autumn. Soldiers were rarely full-time and often needed to attend to their own land at home. In many European countries peasants were obliged to perform around 45 days of military service per year without pay, usually during this campaign season when they were not required for agriculture. By early-spring all the crops would be planted, freeing the male population for warfare until they were needed for harvest time in late-autumn.
Plunder in itself was often an objective of military campaigns, to either pay mercenary forces, seize resources, reduce the fighting capacity of enemy forces, or even just as a public insult to the enemy ruler.
With the advent of castle-building and the extended siege, supply problems became much greater, as armies had to stay in one spot for months, or even years.
Supply trains are as much a feature of Medieval warfare as they are of ancient and modern warfare. Due to the impossibility of maintaining a real front in pre-modern warfare, supplies had to be carried with the army or transported to it while under guard. However, a supply source moving with the army was necessary for any large-scale army to operate. Medieval supply trains are often found in illuminations and even poems of the period.
River and sea travel often provided the easiest way to transport supplies. During his invasion of the Levant, Richard I of England was forced to supply his army as it was marching through a barren desert. By marching his army along the shore, Richard was regularly re-supplied by ships travelling along the coast. Likewise, as in Roman Imperial times, armies would frequently follow rivers while their supplies were being carried by barges. Supplying armies by mass land-transport would not become practical until the invention of rail transport and the internal combustion engine.
The baggage train provided an alternative supply method that was not dependent on access to a water-way. However, it was often a tactical liability. Supply chains forced armies to travel more slowly than a light skirmishing force and were typically centrally placed in the army, protected by the infantry and outriders. Attacks on an enemy's baggage when it was unprotected — as for instance the French attack on the English train at Agincourt, highlighted in the play Henry V—could cripple an army's ability to continue a campaign. This was particularly true in the case of sieges, when large amounts of supplies had to be provided for the besieging army. To refill its supply train, an army would forage extensively as well as re-supply itself in cities or supply points - border castles were frequently stocked with supplies for this purpose.
A failure in logistics often resulted in famine and disease for a medieval army, with corresponding deaths and loss of morale. A besieging force could starve while waiting for the same to happen to the besieged, which meant the siege had to be lifted. With the advent of the great castles of high medieval Europe however, this problem was typically something commanders prepared for on both sides, so sieges could be long, drawn-out affairs.
Epidemics of diseases such as smallpox, cholera, typhoid, and dysentery often swept through medieval armies, especially when poorly supplied or sedentary. In a famous example, in 1347 the bubonic plague erupted in the besieging Mongol army outside the walls of Caffa, Crimea where the disease then spread throughout Europe as the Black Death.
For the inhabitants of a contested area, famine often followed protracted periods of warfare, because foraging armies ate any food stores they could find, reducing or depleting reserve stores. In addition, the overland routes taken by armies on the move could easily destroy a carefully planted field, preventing a crop the following season. Moreover, the death toll in war hit the farming labour pool particularly hard, making it even more difficult to recoup losses.
Medieval Wars: Major European wars of the Middle Ages, arranged chronologically by year begun
-
Umayyad conquest of Hispania (711-718)
-
Muslim conquest of southern Italy (831-902)
-
Byzantine-Seljuk wars (1064–1308)
-
Byzantine-Ottoman wars (1299–1453)
-
Bulgarian-Ottoman Wars (1354–1422)
-
The Byzantine-Bulgarian Wars (680–1364)
-
The Saxon Wars - (772-804)
-
The Spanish Reconquista (718-1492): In which the Moors were driven from the Iberian Peninsula; begun under Pelayo in Asturias, concluded under the Catholic Monarchs (Isabella I of Castile and Ferdinand II of Aragon), of Columbus fame.
-
The Crusades (1096–1291): A generic, catch-all term for Church-sanctioned wars against non-Christians or heretics.
-
1096–1099—First Crusade: The only "successful" crusade against the Islamic Near East; Christian states were established throughout the Levant.
-
1101—Crusade of 1101
-
1147–1149—Second Crusade
-
1147-1410—Northern Crusades
-
1187–1191—Third Crusade
-
1202–1204—Fourth Crusade: In which the Western forces sacked Constantinople
-
1209–1229—Albigensian Crusade: In which the Albigensians in southern France were crushed.
-
1217–1221—Fifth Crusade
-
1228—Sixth Crusade
-
1248–1254—Seventh Crusade
-
1270—Eighth Crusade
-
1271–1291—Ninth Crusade
-
The Hussite Wars (1420–1434)
-
The Hundred Years' War (1337–1453): In which the English were eventually driven out of France;
-
The Wars of the Roses (1455–1487): War for the English throne between the Houses of Lancaster and York
Medieval Battle Equipment & Weapons
-
-
Chain Mail, Hauberks or Haubergeons, Coifs and Pixanes
-
-
Head Armour: Helms, Nasal Helmets, Great Helms, Templar Helms, Bascinets, Armets, Sallets, Barbutes, Close Helms, Burgonets, Morions
-
Neck Armour, Aventails or Camails, Bevor, Gorget
-
Body Armour, Brigandines, Cuirasses, Corslets, Plackards, Faulds, Culets
-
Hand Armour: Gauntlets
-
Leg Armour:Tasset or Tuille, Cuisse, Poleyn, Schynbald, Greave, Chausses,
-
Foot Armour: Sabatons or Sollerets
-
-
Medieval Military Technology
Perhaps the most important technological advancement for medieval warfare in Europe was the invention of the stirrup, which had been unknown to the Romans. It most likely came to Europe with the Avars in the 600's AD, although it was not fully adopted by Europeans until the 900's AD.
In the Medieval period, the mounted cavalry long held sway on the battlefield. Heavily armoured, mounted knights represented a formidable foe for peasant draftees and lightly-armoured freemen. To defeat mounted cavalry, infantry used swarms of missiles or a tightly packed phalanx of men, techniques developed in Antiquity by the Greeks. Ancient generals of Asia used regiments of archers to fend off mounted threats. Alexander the Great combined both methods in his clashes with swarming Asiatic horseman, screening the central infantry core with slingers, archers and javelin men, before unleashing his cavalry to see off attackers.
The use of long pikes and densely-packed foot troops was not uncommon in Medieval times. Flemish footmen at the Battle of the Golden Spurs met and overcame French knights in 1302, and the Scots held their own against heavily-armoured English invaders.
During the St. Louis' crusade, dismounted French knights formed a tight lance-and-shield phalanx to repel Egyptian cavalry. The Swiss used pike tactics in the late medieval period. While pikemen usually grouped together and awaited a mounted attack, the Swiss developed flexible formations and aggressive manoeuvring, forcing their opponents to respond. The Swiss won at Morgarten, Laupen, Sempach, Grandson and Murten, and between 1450 and 1550 every leading prince in Europe hired Swiss pikemen, or emulated their tactics and weapons.
Welsh & English longbowman used a single-piece longbow to deliver arrows that could penetrate contemporary plate armour and mail. The longbow was a difficult weapon to master, requiring years of use and constant practice. A skilled longbowman could shoot about 12 shots per minute. This rate of fire was far superior to competing weapons like the crossbow or early gunpowder weapons. The nearest competitor to the longbow was the much more expensive crossbow, used often by urban militias and mercenary forces. The crossbow had greater range and penetrating power, and did not require the extended years of training.
At Crécy and Agincourt bowmen unleashed clouds of arrows into the ranks of knights. At Crécy, even 15,000 Genoese' crossbowmen could not dislodge them from their hill. At Agincourt, thousands of French knights were brought down by armour-piercing bodkin point arrows and horse-maiming broadheads. The Welsh longbowmen decimated an entire generation of the French nobility.
Since the longbow was difficult to deploy in a thrusting mobile offensive, it was best used in a defensive configuration. Bowmen were extended in thin lines and protected and screened by pits (as at the Battle of Bannockburn), staves or trenches. The terrain was usually chosen to put the archers at an advantage forcing their opponents into a bottleneck (Agincourt) or a hard climb under fire (Crécy). Sometimes bowmen were deployed in a shallow "W", enabling them to trap and enfilade their foes.
The pike and the longbow put an end to the dominance of cavalry in European warfare, making the use of foot soldiers more important than they had been in recent years. Knights began themselves to rather fight dismounted, using two-handed swords, poleaxes and other polearms, as the improved knightly plate armour made them fairly immune to arrows.
Gunpowder eventually was to provoke even more significant changes. However, a mounted reserve was often kept, and the heavy cavalry continued to be an important battlefield arm of European armies until the nineteenth century, when new and more accurate weapons made the mounted soldier too easy a target.
In the armies of Europe, mounted and unmounted crossbowmen, often mixed with javeliners and archers, occupied a central position in battle formations. Usually they engaged the enemy in offensive skirmishes before an assault of mounted knights. Crossbowmen were also valuable in counterattacks to protect their infantry. The rank of commanding officer of the crossbowmen corps was one of the highest positions in any army of this time. Along with polearm weapons made from farming equipment, the crossbow was also a weapon of choice for insurgent peasants such as the Taborites.
Mounted knights armed with lances proved ineffective against formations of pikemen combined with crossbowmen whose weapons could penetrate most knights' armor. The invention of pushlever and ratchet drawing mechanisms enabled the use of crossbows on horseback, leading to the development of new cavalry tactics. Knights and mercenaries deployed in triangular formations, with the most heavily armoured knights at the front. Some of these riders would carry small, powerful all-metal crossbows of their own. Crossbows were eventually replaced in warfare by more powerful gunpowder weapons, although early guns had slower rates of fire and much worse accuracy than contemporary crossbows. Later, similar competing tactics would feature arquebusiers or musketeers in formation with pikemen, pitted against cavalry firing pistols or carbines.
Cannons were introduced to the battlefield in the later medieval period. However, their very poor rate of fire (which often meant that only one shot was fired in the course of an entire battle) and their inaccuracy made them more of a psychological force multiplier than an effective anti-personnel weapon.
Later on in medieval warfare, one handed cannons were introduced, the rate of fire improved only slightly, but the cannons became far easier to aim, largely because they were smaller and much closer to their wielder. Users could be easily protected, because the cannons were lighter and could be moved far more quickly. Real field artillery did not become truly effective or commonly employed until well into the early modern period. The introduction of the arquebus is reflected in contemporary castle architecture - traditional arrow slits were replaced by (or adapted into gun ports).
Some Medieval Battles
-
The Siege of Constantinople (718)
-
The Battle of Tours (732)
-
The Battle of Brunanburh (937)
-
The Battle of Lechfeld (955)
-
The Battle of Tara (980)
-
The Battle of Maldon (c. 991)
-
The Battle of Kleidion (1014)
-
The Battle of Stamford Bridge (1066)
-
The Battle of Hastings (1066)
-
The Battle of Manzikert (1071)
-
The Battle of Levounion (1091)
-
The Siege of Jerusalem (1099)
-
The Siege of Lisbon (1147)
-
The Battle of Sirmium (1167)
-
The Battle of Myriokephalon (1176)
-
The Battle of Hattin (1187)
-
The Battle of Adrianople (1205)
-
The Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa (1212)
-
The Battle of Bouvines (1214)
-
The Battle of Baghdad (1258)
-
The Battle of Fishing Town (1259)
-
The Battle of Ain Jalut (1260)
-
The Battle on the Marchfeld (1278)
-
The Battle of Yamen (1279)
-
The Second Battle of Homs (1281)
-
The Battle of Stirling Bridge (1297)
-
The Battle of the Golden Spurs (1302)
-
The Battle of Bannockburn (1314)
-
The Battle of Dysert O'Dea (1318)
-
The Battle of Faughart (1318)
-
The Battle of Velbazhd (1330)
-
The Battle of Crécy (1346)
-
The Battle of Poitiers (1356)
-
The Battle of Lake Poyang (1363)
-
The Battle of Maritsa (1371)
-
The Battle of Kulikovo (1380)
-
The Battle of Aljubarrota (1385)
-
The Battle of Kosovo (1389)
-
The Battle of Nicopolis (1396)
-
The Battle of Ankara (1402)
-
The Battle of Grunwald/Tannenberg (1410)
-
The Battle of Agincourt (1415)
-
The Battle of Patay (1429)
-
The Battle of Varna (1444)
-
The Fall of Constantinople (1453)
-
The Siege of Belgrade (1456)
-
The Battle of Towton (1461)
-
The Battle of Vaslui (1475)
-
The Battle of Nancy (1477)
-
The Siege of Rhodes (1480)
-
The Battle of Bosworth Field (1485)
-
The Battle of Knockdoe (1504)
Longbow Men
Arquebus
Armour piercing bodkin - a type of arrow head
Mons Meg at Edinburgh Castle
The Christian surrender at the battle of Hattin - 1187
Medieval Military Communications
Battlefield communications before the advent of strict lines of communication were difficult. Communication was done through musical signals (drums and horns), audible commands, mounted messengers, and visual signals such as flags.
Fire beacons were used in many places where there was a network of towers or castles visible one from another. On the border between England and scotland a line of Peel Towers was built for exactly this purpose. In Scandinavia many hill forts were part of beacon networks to warn against invading pillagers. In Wales, the Brecon Beacons were named for beacons used to warn of approaching English raiders. In England, the most famous examples are the beacons used in Elizabethan England to warn of the approaching Spanish Armada. Many hills in England were named Beacon Hill after such beacons. In the Languedoc, where castles were often built on mountain tops, castles were almost invariably in view of at least one one other castle.
Carrier pigeons historically carried messages only one way, to their home. They had to be transported manually before another flight.
By placing their food at one location and their home at another location, pigeons have been trained to fly back and forth up to twice a day reliably. This setup allows Pigeons to cover 160 km round trip.
Fire Beacon
Medieval Military Organisation
The medieval knight was usually mounted and armoured, often connected with nobility or royalty, although especially in north-eastern Europe knights could also come from the lower classes.
The cost of a knight's armour, horses, and weapons was great. This helped transform the knight, at least in western Europe, into a distinct social class separate from other warriors.
During the crusades, holy orders of monks who were also knights were created, including the Knights Templar, the Knights Hospitaller and the Teutonic Knights. They were formed to fight in the Holy Land and became the "storm troops" of the Christian crusaders.
Heavy cavalry, armed with lances and an assortment of hand weapons, played a significant part in the battles of the Middle Ages. The heavy cavalry consisted of nobles and wealthy knights who could afford the equipment.
Heavy cavalry made the difference between victory and defeat in many key battles. Their charges could break the lines of most infantry formations, making them a valuable asset to all medieval armies, the equivalent of twentieth century tank regiments.
Light cavalry consisted of lighter armed and armoured men, who could have lances, javelins or missile weapons, such as bows or crossbows. Light cavalry were used as scouts, skirmishers or outflankers. Many countries developed their own styles of light cavalry, such as Hungarian mounted archers, Spanish jinetes, Italian and German mounted crossbowmen.
Crusaders tended to favour heavy cavalry mounted on mares while the Saracens favoured light cavalry mounted on stallions.
Infantry were recruited and trained in a wide variety of manners in different regions of Europe all through the Middle Ages, and probably always formed the most numerous part of a medieval field army. Many infantrymen in prolonged wars would be mercenaries. Most armies contained significant numbers of spearmen, archers and other unmounted soldiers.
In sieges, perhaps the most common element of medieval warfare, infantry units served as garrison troops and archers, among other positions. Towards the end of the Middle Ages, with the advancements of weapons and armour, infantrymen became more important.
In the earliest Middle Ages it was the obligation of every noble to respond to the call to battle from his liege lord with his own equipment, archers, and infantry. This decentralized system was necessary due to the social order of the time, but could lead to motley forces with variable training, equipment and abilities. The more resources the noble had access to, the better his troops would typically be.
Typically feudal armies consisted of a core of highly skilled knights and their household troops, mercenaries hired for the time of the campaign and feudal levies fulfilling their feudal obligations, who usually were little more than rabble. They could, however, be efficient in disadvantageous terrain. Towns and cities could also field militias.
As central governments grew in power, a return to the citizen and mercenary armies of the classical period also began, as central levies of the peasantry began to be the central recruiting tool. It is often claimed that the best infantrymen came from the younger sons of free land-owning yeomen, such as the English archers and Swiss pikemen.
England was one of the most centralized states in the Middle Ages, and the armies that fought the Hundred Years' War were mostly paid professionals. In theory, every Englishman had an obligation to serve for forty days. Forty days (called quarantine) was not long enough for a campaign, especially one on the continent.
Scutage was introduced, under which most Englishmen paid to escape their service and this money was used to create a permanent army. Almost all high medieval armies in Europe were composed of a great deal of paid core troops, and there was a large mercenary market in Europe from the early twelfth century.
As the Middle Ages progressed, both the Papacy and Italian cities began to rely mostly on mercenaries to do their fighting rather than the militias that had dominated the early and high medieval period in this region. These would be groups of career soldiers who would be paid a set rate. Mercenaries tended to be effective soldiers, especially in combination with standing forces. In Italy they came to dominate the armies of the city states. While at war they were considerably more reliable than a standing army, but in peacetime they proved a risk to the state itself (as the Pretorian Guard had once been in Roman times).
Mercenary-on-mercenary warfare in Italy led to relatively bloodless campaigns which relied as much on manoeuvre as on battles, since the condottieri recognized it was more efficient to attack the enemy's ability to wage war rather than his battle forces,, and attempting to attack the enemy supply lines, his economy and his ability to wage war rather than risking an open battle, and manoeuvre him in a position where risking a battle would have been suicidal.
Knights were drawn to battle by feudal and social obligation, but also by the prospect of profit and advancement. Those who performed well stood to increase their landholdings and advance in the social hierarchy - this was a major factor in the Crusades in the Holy Land and also European crusades such as the Albigensian Crusade - the War against the Cathars of the Languedoc.
For the mounted knight Medieval Warfare could be a relatively low risk affair. Nobles avoided killing each other, rather preferring capturing them alive, for several reasons for one, many were related to each other, had fought alongside one another, and they were all members of the same elite culture; for another, a noble's ransom could be very high, and indeed some made a living by capturing and ransoming nobles in battle.
Huge ransoms could be demanded for captured knights and more still for high nobles and kings. Some knights made their fortunes by fighting. William the Marshall being the best known example. Even peasants, who did not share the bonds of kinship and culture, would often avoid killing a nobleman, valuing the high ransom that a live capture could bring, as well as the valuable horse, armour and equipment that came with him. On the other hand it was quite common, even at the height of "chivalric" warfare, for the knights to suffer heavy casualties during battles. Christendom was shaken when King Peter II of Aragon was killed fighting on the side of his vassal Raymond of Toulouse at Muret in the Languedoc.
Clergymen played a major part in battles - from their planning to building siege engines (a clerical specialty), encouraging the troops and taking part in the fighting. We have many accounts of senior clergy leading battles and not only during the crusades. They are also depicted in contemporary art - popes, cardinals and bishops, wearing full armour and wielding weapons. The role of military bishops is commemorated today by the presence of four bishops on a chess board. Clerical combatants are depicted in medieval art and according to tradition favoured the mace as a weapon (a mace could kill without shedding blood which the Church considered desirable).
On the other hand swords feature more heavily than maces in the arms of England bishops
Bishop of LondonBishop of St-AlbansBishop of WinchesterBishop of Exeter
Knights Templar and Knights Hospitaller, the shock troops of Christian armies, were monks in the fullest sense- they took the same vows as other monks in addition to their vows as knights. If caught by the enemy they were almost always executed while other knights were usually ransomed. The reason was that they were such fanatical fighters that it made sense to put them permanently out of the war whenever possible.
The practice of carrying relics into battle is a feature that distinguishes medieval warfare from its predecessors or from early modern warfare. The presence of relics was believed to be an important source of supernatural power that served both as a spiritual weapon and a form of defence; the relics of martyrs were considered by Saint John Chrysostom much more powerful than "walls, trenches, weapons and hosts of soldiers" - another reason for so many lost battles.
In Italy, the carroccio or carro della guerra, the "war wagon" , was an elaboration of this practice that developed during the 13th century. A Carroccio was a four-wheeled war altar drawn by oxen, used by the medieval republics of Italy. It was a rectangular platform on which the standard of the city and an altar were erected. Priests held services on the altar before the battle, and the trumpeters beside them encouraged the fighters to the fray.
The carro della guerra of Milan was draped in scarlet cloth and drawn by three yoke of oxen caparisoned in white with the red cross of Saint George, the city's patron, it carried a crucifix so massive it took four men to step it in place, like a ship's mast.
Knights Templar
Bishop Odo wielding his mace against an Anglo-Saxon knight at the Battle of Hastings (From the Bayeaux Tapestry)
Bishop Adhemar of Le Puy a bishop, recognisable by his mitre, riding to battle with other knights at Antioch on 28th June 1098. He is carrying a Holy Lance.
A War Waggon
carroccio della guerra - A religious war waggon
The Prince Bishop of Durham displayed (and still displays) his bishop's mitre within a ducal coronet, reflecting his temporal power. Behind the shield are a crozier and a sword.
Women at War
Contrary to popular belief, women often engaged in medieval warfare. If the Chatelaine happened to be at home while their husband was away and their castle was besieged, it was routine for her to command the defences.
Here are some examples of notable Medieval femail warriors:
-
8th century: Shieldmaidens fight at the Battle of Bråvalla on the side of the Danes.
-
722: Queen Aethelburg of Wessex destroys the town of Taunton.
-
750: Veborg, as well as many other Shieldmaidens, participate in the Battle of Bråvalla in Sweden.
-
783: Saxon women throw themselves barebreasted into battle against Charlemagne's forces. Among them is Fastrada, who became Charlemagne's fourth wife.
-
Early 9th century: Cwenthryth fights Wulfred, Archbishop of Canterbury, for control of her abbey estates.
-
880: Ermengarda defends Vienne.[20]
-
912-922: Reign of Ethelfleda, ruler of Mercia. She commanded armies, fortified towns, and defeated the Danes. She also defeated the Welsh and forced them to pay tribute to her.
-
Mid 10th century: Queen Thyra of Denmark leads an army against the Germans.
-
971: The Scandinavian ruler of Kiev attacked the Byzantines in Bulgaria in 971. When the Norsemen had been defeated, the victors discovered shieldmaidens among the fallen warriors.
-
Early 11th century: Freydís Eiríksdóttir, a Viking woman, sails to Vinland with Thorfinn Karlsefni. When she faced hostile natives while pregnant, she exposed her breasts and beat her chest with a sword. This caused the natives to run away.
-
1040-1090: Sichelgaita of Salerno second wife of Robert Guiscard, Duke of Apulia, accompanies her husband on military campaigns, and regularly puts on full armor and rides into battle at his side. At the Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081) she rallied Robert's troops when they were initially repulsed by the Byzantine army.
-
1046-1115: Lifetime of Matilda of Tuscany, the principal Italian supporter of Pope Gregory VII during the Investiture Controversy.. She is sometimes called la Gran Contessa ("the Great Countess") or Matilda of Canossa after her ancestral castle of Canossa.
-
1071: Richilde, Countess of Mons and Hainaut is captured fighting in the Battle of Cassel.
-
1072: Urraca of Zamora, Infanta of Castile, defends the city of Zamora against her brother, Sancho II of Castile.
-
1075: Emma de Guader, Countess of Norfolk defends Norwich castle while it is under siege.
-
1090: A Norman woman Isabel of Conches rides armed as a knight.
-
1121:Urraca of Castile fights her half-sister, Theresa, Countess of Portugal when she refuses to surrender the city of Tuy.
-
1131-1160: Melisende of Jerusalem ruler of the crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem is one of the rulers involved in the Second Crusade.
-
1136: Welsh princess Gwenllian ferch Gruffydd leads an army against the Normans. She is defeated and killed.
-
1141: Matilda of Boulogne raises an army to continue the fight for the crown of England, after her husband, King Stephen is captured by the Empress Matilda.
-
1145: Eleanor of Aquitaine accompanies her husband on the Second Crusade.
-
1172: Alrude Countess of Bertinoro ends a siege of Aucona by leading an army into battle and crushing imperial troops.
-
Late 12th century: Eva MacMurrough conducts battles on behalf of her husband, the Earl of Pembroke.
-
3rd May 1211. The chatelaine of Lavaur, Gerauda (or Geralda) de Lavaur, was murdered by Catholic Crusaders because of her part in resisting their siege of Lavaur during the Cathar Crusade. Click here to read more about the siege of Lavaur
-
Mid 13th century: Eleanor of Castile accompanies her husband on his crusade. According to legend, she saves his life by sucking poison from his wound when he was injured.
-
1264: Eleanor of Provence raises troops in France for her husband during the Baron's War.
-
1271: Isabella of Aragon dies at Consenza on the way back from the Crusades.
-
1290: An illustration of a woman named Walpurgis is shown training in sword and buckler techniques
-
14th century: Jane, Countess of Montfort leads troops into battle. Countess Jeanne de Penthievre is among her antagonists.
-
1326: Isabella of France invades England with Roger de Mortimer, and overthrows Edward II, replacing him with her son Edward III, with her and de Mortimer acting as regents.
-
1334: Agnes Dunbar successfully defends her castle against a siege by the Earl of Salisbury.
-
1335: The Scots defeat a company led by the Count of Namur. Amongst the Count's casualties was a female lancer who had killed her opponent, Richard Shaw, at the same moment that he had killed her. Her gender was only discovered when the bodies were being stripped of their armour at the end of the engagement. "The chronicler Bower seems to have been at least as impressed by the rarity of two mounted soldiers simultaneously transfixing one another with their lances as with the fact that one of them was a woman."
-
1364-1405: Tamerlane uses female archers to defend baggage trains.
-
1383: Eleanor of Arborea, ruler of Sardinia, conducts a defensive war against Aragon.
-
15th century: Maire o Ciaragain leads Irish clans in rebellion.
-
15th century: Isabella, Duchess of Lorraine, leads an army to rescue her husband from the Duke of Burgundy.
-
1429: Joan of Arc leads the French army. Yolande of Aragon supports her. Pierronne, a contemporary of hers, also hears voices and fights for the king of France.
-
1461: Queen Margaret of Anjou defeats the Earl of Warwick in the Wars of the Roses.
-
1461: Lady Knyvet defends Buckingham Castle at Norfolk against Sir Gilbert of Debenhem
-
1471: Queen Margaret of Anjou is defeated in battle at Tewksbury.
-
1472: Onorata Rodiana from Cremona, Italy is mortally wounded in battle. She had disguised herself as a man to become a soldier.
-
June 27, 1472: Jeanne Hachette rips down the flag of the invading Burgundians at Beauvais, inspiring the garrison to win the engagement
Eleanor of Arborea
Isabella of France
Joan of Arc
Crusaders atAntioch
Fall of Acre, the Crusaders' last stronghold in the Holy Land, in 1291.
Taunting was an integral part of siege warfare
A siege using early cannon to fire stone balls to destroy the top of the castle walls.
Here, the defenders have used barrels filled with stones as a temporary repair to their defences.
a rather basic and precarious belfry
Counterwieght trebuchets
A war-waggon
A war-wagon adapted to carry a field gun
The city of Ai is captured and its King is hanged - Joshua 8:23 - Pictures from the Maciejowski Bible ~1250
Medieval pictures represent contemporary fashions and weaponry - not those approriate to the period represented.
Siege of Constantinople
Cannon used at the siege of Rouen (19 January 1419)
An early gun. Bellifortis Besançon (BM, 1360)
Göttingen, Staatsbibliothek, Codex. MS. philos. 63 (15th century)
The besiegers are trying to pull down the drawbridge. Others appear to be canouflaged as bushes,
presumably to get near to the walls.
Philippe Augustus and Richard the Lion-Heart recieving the keys to the city afterthe siege of Acre - 12th century
This is a French illustration so bolsters the role of the French King.
As a military commander Philippe was in reality several leagues below Richard.
A model belfry showing how it could opperate at several levels,
with a ram at the bottom, draw bridges all the way up, and crenallations at the top.
Another style of belfry, with defensive metal plates at different levels.
Another belfry - showing how the skins of freshly slaughtered animals were used to protect against fire.
Design for a belfry
Belfries and a ram in action
Mittelalterliches Hausbuch von Schloss Wolfegg. Detail
The Trojan horse - an early example of the use of psychology in warfare
Counterweight Trebuchets
Ancient Roman siege machines were more technologically advanced than their medieval counterparts
A siege ladder features in the crest of the arms of Grey.
Greek stamp showing the use of Greek Fire at sea
Women were not trained as warriers, but often participated in defending their cities when needed
(as at Toulouse in 1218, where the women of the city were credited with killing Simon de Montfort)
Ram from a Treatises on Engines and Weapons, Italy- c. 1510 MS Hunter H220 38vd
A belfry, from a Treatises on Engines and Weapons, Italy - c. 1510 MS Hunter 220 (U.2.1) H220 10rd
A Tortoise (under which miners would undermine walls).
Apollodori-Poliorcetica (Excerpta), detail of folio 26 verso - H220 26vd
A ram
Mounted Crossbow
Yet another belfry
A large crossbow
A Mangonell
Another style of ram, mounted on a slider, moved by pulling ropes
Manuscript drawing of a gonne, or hand cannon from the 1400's
Bombard 1400s
This castle has a walk-way giving access to an external water supply.
The style is similar to the one at Carcassonne.
Joan of Arc at the siege of Orleans.
A counterwieght trebuchet
A counterwieght trebuchet
The taking of Château Gaillard - Vigiles du roi Charles VII
Recommended sites for Further Information
Medievality
http://www.medievality.com/
Knights and Armor
http://www.knightsandarmor.com
Warfare during the Crusades
http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/categories/crusadeswarfare.htm
A collection of translations of primary source material, articles and reviews on the period.
Medieval Sourcebook
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/sbook.html
Online Reference Book for Medieval Studies
http://the-orb.net/
Cunnan
http://cunnan.sca.org.au/wiki/Main_Page
Mostly Medieval
http://www.mostly-medieval.com/
Flags of the Crusades 1099-1291
http://flagspot.net/flags/crusade.html
Medieval Fiefdom
http://library.thinkquest.org/10949/
An educational site about living and working in eleventh to fourteenth century England, produced by high school students.
The End of Europe's Middle Ages
http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/endmiddle/
A large tutorial site designed to assist those students engaged in Renaissance, Reformation and Early Modern studies who lack a background in medieval European history.
The History of Costume
http://www.siue.edu/COSTUMES/COSTUME3_INDEX.HTML
Illustrations from Braun & Schneider - c.1861-1880
Eyewitness to History
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/mefrm.htm
Important events described by eyewitnesses, with introductory explanations. Includes the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle on the 12th-century English civil war, Marco Polo describing Kublai Khan in battle, and the discovery of America by Columbus.
The Normans, A European People
http://www.mondes-normands.caen.fr/angleterre/index.htm
Comprehensive coverage of the history, culture and heritage of the Normans in France, the British Isles and Italy. Includes biographies, genealogies of rulers, a gazetteer of Norman buildings, places to visit and bibliographies.
The Year 1000
http://www.mille.org/scholarship/1000/1000-pg.html
Medieval attitudes to the end of the previous millennium and argues for an apocalyptic viewpoint, Center for Millennial Studies.
Archery articles
http://margo.student.utwente.nl/sagi/artikel/
Selection of articles from the Journal of the Society of Archer-Antiquaries.
De Re Militari Society homepage
http://www.deremilitari.org/
An academic association examining medieval warfare and military history. Features information on the society as well as original articles and book reviews.
The Society of Ancients
http://www.soa.org.uk/
The International Amateur Society for Ancient and Medieval Wargamers
ORB
http://the-orb.net/bibliographies/castles.html
Os Jacques são massacrados em Meaux (1358) (FR 2813), fol. 414v, Grandes Chroniques de France, France, Paris, XIVe s. (70 x 65 mm)
Recommended Videos
Siege of Rochester 1215
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EAB6ZGAqDw
Trebuchet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pR26RMI9T8c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN18I-RBVm4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1EAA7pkEJ4
Ladders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1GQ0HTRpIk
Siege towers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXsYJD3BJlQ
Long bow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGcm-J1ggfw
Cross bow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxN0FZkYk78 – mid range
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ziq5zm4uO-Y - heavy
Siège de Melun par Robert le Pieux, roi de France. Grandes Chroniques de France de Charles V, Paris, XIVème siècle
« Bataille entre les Francs, commandés par le roi Clotaire II, et les Saxons ». Grandes Chroniques de France de Charles V. France, Paris, XIVème siècle. 65 x 65 mm. Bibliothèque nationale de France.
Bataille de Roncevaux entre Roland et Marsile (778). Grandes Chroniques de France France, Paris, XIVe s
Massacre de Sarrasins. Grandes Chroniques de France, Paris, XIVe s. Bibliothèque Nationale de France.
« Combat singulier entre le roi Clotaire II et Bertoald ». Grandes Chroniques de France de Charles V. France, Paris, XIVème siècle. 65 x 65 mm. Bibliothèque nationale de France.
Assassinat de sigebert Ier. Grandes Chroniques de France vers 1375-1380. Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Paris.
Medieval Warfare-c1250 Granger
The Master de Saint-Ferriol takes a breather




